Australia Market Report for Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Devices - 2016

 Published On: Nov, 2015 |    No of Pages: 145 |  Published By: iData Research Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample
Reconstructive implants are grouped into four broad categories: primary (total) replacement, partial replacement, resurfacing and revision.

Total joint replacement (TJR) involves replacing both sides of the natural joint. These devices are the most frequently used reconstructive procedures in the United States.

Partial joint replacements restore one side or a portion of the joint. These procedures have the advantage of preserving more bone and soft tissue but have historically been prone to a higher complication rate than total joint replacements. Partial replacement, also known as hemiarthroplasty, provides an alternative to joint fixation, or arthrodesis, in some instances of skeletal trauma.

Joint resurfacing attempts to preserve as much of the original bone stock as possible by placing a cap over the diseased joint surfaces. The cap is anchored by a short stem within the bone. These procedures are performed more frequently in younger patients, as the preservation of bone stock allows for better outcomes when the implant is eventually replaced later in life.

Revision implants are not a specific product type but refer to the replacement of implanted devices that have either reached the end of their useable lifespan or have become loosened through trauma or pathology. This may entail either the replacement of part of the implant or the entire implant. In general, revision implants require longer stems to anchor in the bone. Conservative estimates indicate that 15 years is an appropriate lifespan to expect from an implant regardless of its construction or method of fixation; however, newer devices are likely to exceed that time frame.

If anything, the trend towards younger patients has meant that the market has been even more mindful of preparing for the eventuality of revision because of the increased average lifespan for these surgical candidates.

Implants are subject to their own wear issues. Regardless of the type of construction, there are some basic safety concerns. Like the cartilage that it replaces, the articulating material is subject to wear. The concern remains with debris generation. While the material itself is inert, the body’s immune response to stray fragments creates the potential for osteolysis, the destruction of bone. There are similar concerns with devices using hard-on-hard articulating surfaces, as early ceramic materials were prone to chipping. Reconstructive implants are grouped into four broad categories: primary (total) replacement, partial replacement, resurfacing and revision.

There is an increasing trend towards marketing patient-specific implants, especially those targeted at women. This follows the overall trend of greater product diversification and provides a synergy with consumer-directed marketing. One of the key drivers is the Internet, with acknowledgement that patients who have educated themselves are not only more likely to choose implantation surgery over other options but also to choose a specific brand of implant.

The original technique of arthroplasty involved cementing the implanted device with bone cement, which provided immediate fixation. This is beneficial from the standpoint of recovery, as a strongly fixated joint allows for more successful rehabilitation and an earlier return to active living. The significant disadvantage is that the process of cementing kills bone cells. As bone naturally replenishes itself, the reduced stock of bone building osteoblast cells means that the device-bone interface weakens over time, resulting in a loosening of the joint.

Simultaneous bilateral implantation is a procedure that involves replacing both left and right joints in the same surgical operation. The benefit of doing so is reduced overall surgical time and a shortened combined rehabilitation period for patients. The main drawback is increased blood loss during the operation.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is sometimes regarded as much of a marketing term as it is a method of surgery. While all parties define MIS as surgery that requires a lesser degree of tissue disruption, there is no concrete way of quantifying what objective measures describe MIS surgeries.

Computer-guided systems represent a small portion of the joint replacement market at present. Alignment is more precise and incisions are smaller, but issues remain with obtaining accurate patient landmark data during surgery. These systems need to be properly oriented in order to obtain accurate navigation, but this depends greatly on patient positioning. Most systems require patients to be precisely repositioned during surgery, which increases time spent in the operating room as well as the chance of infection.

Because of an understandable aversion to surgery, implantation technology will likely face competition from therapies that require less invasive procedures. Most of these technologies are focused on regenerating the diseased cartilage layer rather than eliminating it, as is performed with joint replacement.There is an increasing trend towards marketing patient-specific implants, especially those targeted at women. This follows the overall trend of greater product diversification and provides a synergy with consumer-directed marketing. One of the key drivers is the Internet, with acknowledgement that patients who have educated themselves are not only more likely to choose implantation surgery over other options but also to choose a specific brand of implant.

The original technique of arthroplasty involved cementing the implanted device with bone cement, which provided immediate fixation. This is beneficial from the standpoint of recovery, as a strongly fixated joint allows for more successful rehabilitation and an earlier return to active living. The significant disadvantage is that the process of cementing kills bone cells. As bone naturally replenishes itself, the reduced stock of bone building osteoblast cells means that the device-bone interface weakens over time, resulting in a loosening of the joint.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS I
LIST OF FIGURES VII
LIST OF CHARTS XI
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 1
1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE 1
1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY 1
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 1
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 3
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 4
Step 4: Performing Primary Research 5
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 7
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 8
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 10
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 11
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 12
ORTHOPEDIC LARGE JOINT REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW 13
2.1 INTRODUCTION 13
2.1.1 Anatomy and Pathology 13
2.1.2 Treatment 14
2.1.3 Treatment Complications 15
2.1.4 General Product Classifications 15
2.1.4.1 Total Joint Replacement 16
2.1.4.2 Partial Joint Replacement 16
2.1.4.3 Joint Resurfacing 16
2.1.4.4 Revision 16
2.1.4.5 Implant Wear and Durability 16
2.1.5 Patient-Specific Products and Consumer Awareness 17
2.1.6 Cementless versus Cemented Implantation 17
2.1.7 Simultaneous Bilateral Implantation 18
2.1.8 Minimally Invasive Surgery 18
2.1.9 Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems 18
2.1.10 Emerging Technologies 18
2.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 20
2.3 TREND ANALYSIS 24
2.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 26
2.4.1 Market Drivers 26
2.4.2 Market Limiters 26
2.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 28
PROCEDURE NUMBERS 31
3.1 INTRODUCTION 31
3.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS 32
3.2.1 Total Large Joint Replacement Procedures 32
3.2.2 Knee Replacement Procedures 34
3.2.2.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures 35
3.2.2.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type 35
3.2.2.1.2 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Construction Type 36
3.2.2.1.3 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type 37
3.2.2.2 Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Product Type 38
3.2.2.3 Knee Replacement Revision Procedures 39
3.2.3 Hip Replacement Procedures 40
3.2.3.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures 41
3.2.3.1.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type 41
3.2.3.1.2 Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type 42
3.2.3.2 Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Product Type 43
3.2.3.3 Resurfacing Hip Replacement Procedures 44
KNEE REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET 45
4.1 INTRODUCTION 45
4.1.1 Anatomy 45
4.1.2 Pathology 45
4.1.3 Treatment 45
4.1.4 Implant Types 46
4.1.4.1 Total Knee Replacement 46
4.1.4.2 Partial Knee Replacement 46
4.1.4.3 Knee Revision 46
4.1.5 Fixation Method 46
4.1.6 Bearing Surface 47
4.1.7 Fixed versus Mobile Bearings 47
4.1.8 Cruciate-Retaining versus Posterior Stabilized 47
4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 48
4.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 51
4.3.1 Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type 51
4.3.1.1 Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market 54
4.3.1.2 Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market 55
4.3.1.3 Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market 56
4.3.2 Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Construction Type 57
4.3.2.1 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market 60
4.3.2.2 Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market 61
4.3.3 Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type 62
4.3.3.1 Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market 65
4.3.3.2 Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market 66
4.3.4 Partial Knee Replacement Device Market 67
4.3.4.1 Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market 70
4.3.4.2 Patellofemoral Partial Knee Replacement Market 71
4.3.5 Knee Replacement Revision Market 72
4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 75
4.4.1 Market Drivers 75
4.4.2 Market Limiters 75
4.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 77

HIP REPLACEMENT DEVICE MARKET 81
5.1 INTRODUCTION 81
5.1.1 Anatomy 81
5.1.2 Pathology 81
5.1.3 Treatment 81
5.1.4 Implant Types 81
5.1.4.1 Primary Hip Joint Replacement 81
5.1.4.2 Partial Hip Joint Replacement 82
5.1.4.3 Resurfacing Hip Joint Replacement 82
5.1.4.4 Revision Hip Joint Replacement 82
5.1.5 Fixation Method 83
5.1.6 Implant Material 83
5.1.7 Bearing Surface Technology 83
5.1.7.1 Polyethylene Bearings 83
5.1.7.2 Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings 83
5.1.7.3 Metal Bearings 84
5.1.7.4 Ceramic Bearings 84
5.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 85
5.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 90
5.3.1 Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type 90
5.3.1.1 Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market 93
5.3.1.2 Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market 94
5.3.1.3 Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market 95
5.3.2 Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type 96
5.3.2.1 Metal on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market 100
5.3.2.2 Metal on Metal Total Hip Replacement Market 101
5.3.2.3 Ceramic on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market 102
5.3.2.4 Ceramic on Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market 103
5.3.3 Partial Hip Replacement Device Market 104
5.3.3.1 Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market 107
5.3.3.2 Unipolar Partial Knee Implant Market 108
5.3.4 Resurfacing Hip Replacement Market 109
5.3.5 Hip Replacement Revision Market 111
5.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 113
5.4.1 Market Drivers 113
5.4.2 Market Limiters 113
5.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 115
BONE CEMENT MARKET 119
6.1 INTRODUCTION 119
6.1.1 Antibiotic Usage 119
6.1.2 Increased Popularity of Cementless Implants 120
6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 121
6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 124
6.3.1 Total Bone Cement Market 124
6.3.2 Traditional Bone Cement Market 126
6.3.3 Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market 127
6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 128
6.4.1 Market Drivers 128
6.4.2 Market Limiters 128
6.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 130
ABBREVIATIONS 133

LIST OF CHARTS
Chart 2 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 22
Chart 2 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market Breakdown, Australia, 2015 23
Chart 2 3: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market Breakdown, Australia, 2022 23
Chart 2 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 25
Chart 2 5: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2015 30
Chart 3 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Procedures by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 32
Chart 3 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Procedures Breakdown, Australia, 2015 33
Chart 3 3: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Procedures Breakdown, Australia, 2022 33
Chart 3 4: Knee Reconstruction Procedures by Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 34
Chart 3 5: Hip Reconstruction Procedures by Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 40
Chart 4 1: Knee Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 49
Chart 4 2: Knee Replacement Device Market Breakdown, Australia, 2015 50
Chart 4 3: Knee Replacement Device Market Breakdown, Australia, 2022 50
Chart 4 4: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 53
Chart 4 5: Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 54
Chart 4 6: Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 55
Chart 4 7: Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 56
Chart 4 8: Primary Knee Reconstruction Device Market by Construction Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 59
Chart 4 9: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 60
Chart 4 10: Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 61
Chart 4 11: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 64
Chart 4 12: Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 65
Chart 4 13: Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 66
Chart 4 14: Partial Knee Replacement Device Market by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 69
Chart 4 15: Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 70
Chart 4 16: Patellofemoral Partial Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 71
Chart 4 17: Knee Replacement Revision Implant Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 74
Chart 4 18: Leading Competitors, Knee Reconstruction Device Market, Australia, 2015 79
Chart 5 1: Hip Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 88
Chart 5 2: Hip Replacement Device Market Breakdown, Australia, 2015 89
Chart 5 3: Hip Replacement Device Market Breakdown, Australia, 2022 89
Chart 5 4: Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 92
Chart 5 5: Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 93
Chart 5 6: Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 94
Chart 5 7: Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 95
Chart 5 8: Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 99
Chart 5 9: Metal on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 100
Chart 5 10: Metal on Metal Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 101
Chart 5 11: Ceramic on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 102
Chart 5 12: Ceramic on Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 103
Chart 5 13: Partial Hip Replacement Device Market by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 106
Chart 5 14: Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 107
Chart 5 15: Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 108
Chart 5 16: Resurfacing Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 110
Chart 5 17: Hip Replacement Revision Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 112
Chart 5 18: Leading Competitors, Hip Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2015 117
Chart 6 1: Bone Cement Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 122
Chart 6 2: Bone Cement Market Breakdown, Australia, 2015 123
Chart 6 3: Bone Cement Market Breakdown, Australia, 2022 123
Chart 6 4: Total Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 125
Chart 6 5: Traditional Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 126
Chart 6 6: Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 127
Chart 6 7: Leading Competitors, Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2015 132

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 21
Figure 2 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 22
Figure 2 3: Growth Rates by Segment, Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 24
Figure 2 4: Drivers and Limiters, Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2015 27
Figure 2 5: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2015 30
Figure 3 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Procedures by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 32
Figure 3 2: Knee Replacement Procedures by Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 34
Figure 3 3: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 35
Figure 3 4: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Construction Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 36
Figure 3 5: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 37
Figure 3 6: Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 38
Figure 3 7: Knee Replacement Revision Procedures, Australia, 2012 – 2022 39
Figure 3 8: Hip Replacement Procedures by Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 40
Figure 3 9: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 41
Figure 3 10: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 42
Figure 3 11: Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 43
Figure 3 12: Resurfacing Hip Replacement Procedures, Australia, 2012 – 2022 44
Figure 3 13: Hip Replacement Revision Procedures, Australia, 2012 – 2022 44
Figure 4 1: Knee Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 48
Figure 4 2: Knee Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 49
Figure 4 3: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 52
Figure 4 4: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 53
Figure 4 5: Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 54
Figure 4 6: Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 55
Figure 4 7: Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 56
Figure 4 8: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Construction Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 58
Figure 4 9: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Construction Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 59
Figure 4 10: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 60
Figure 4 11: Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 61
Figure 4 12: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 63
Figure 4 13: Total Knee Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 64
Figure 4 14: Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 65
Figure 4 15: Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 66
Figure 4 16: Partial Knee Replacement Device Market by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 68
Figure 4 17: Partial Knee Replacement Device Market by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 69
Figure 4 18: Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 70
Figure 4 19: Patellofemoral Partial Knee Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 71
Figure 4 20: Knee Replacement Revision Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 73
Figure 4 21: Drivers and Limiters, Knee Reconstruction Device Market, Australia, 2015 76
Figure 4 22: Leading Competitors, Knee Reconstruction Device Market, Australia, 2015 78
Figure 5 1: Hip Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 86
Figure 5 2: Hip Replacement Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 87
Figure 5 3: Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 91
Figure 5 4: Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Cementation Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 92
Figure 5 5: Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 93
Figure 5 6: Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 94
Figure 5 7: Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 95
Figure 5 8: Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 97
Figure 5 9: Total Hip Replacement Device Market by Bearing Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 98
Figure 5 10: Metal on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 100
Figure 5 11: Metal on Metal Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 101
Figure 5 12: Ceramic on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 102
Figure 5 13: Ceramic on Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and
AU$) 103
Figure 5 14: Partial Hip Replacement Device Market by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 105
Figure 5 15: Partial Hip Replacement Device Market by Product Type, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 106
Figure 5 16: Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 107
Figure 5 17: Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 108
Figure 5 18: Resurfacing Hip Replacement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 109
Figure 5 19: Hip Replacement Revision Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 111
Figure 5 20: Drivers and Limiters, Hip Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2015 114
Figure 5 21: Leading Competitors, Hip Replacement Device Market, Australia, 2015 116
Figure 6 1: Bone Cement Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$M) 121
Figure 6 2: Bone Cement Market by Segment, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (AU$M) 122
Figure 6 3: Total Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 125
Figure 6 4: Traditional Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 126
Figure 6 5: Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2012 – 2022 (US$ and AU$) 127
Figure 6 6: Drivers and Limiters, Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2015 129
Figure 6 7: Leading Competitors, Bone Cement Market, Australia, 2015 131

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.