The 2016-2021 Outlook for Cotton Wrapping, Seine, and Other Twine in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 249 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for cotton wrapping, seine, and other twine across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 3,100 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for cotton wrapping, seine, and other twine. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for cotton wrapping, seine, and other twine in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 33
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 42
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 43
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 43
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 44
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 45
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 45
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 46
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 47
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 48
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 49
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 50
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 52
4 GREAT LAKES 54
4.1 Executive Summary 54
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 55
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 56
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 60
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 64
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 65
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 66
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 68
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 69
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 71
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 73
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 74
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 77
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 80
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 81
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 82
5 MID-ATLANTIC 84
5.1 Executive Summary 84
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 86
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 87
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 87
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 88
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 89
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 89
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 90
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 91
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 93
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 96
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 97
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 100
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 104
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 105
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 109
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 113
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 114
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 116
6 NEW ENGLAND 118
6.1 Executive Summary 118
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 120
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 121
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 123
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 125
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 126
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 126
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 127
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 128
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 131
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 134
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 135
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 135
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 136
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 137
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 137
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 138
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 139
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 139
7 PLAINS 140
7.1 Executive Summary 140
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 142
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 143
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 144
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 145
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 146
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 147
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 148
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 149
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 151
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 153
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 154
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 155
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 157
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 158
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 158
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 159
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 160
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 160
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 161
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 162
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 162
8 ROCKIES 163
8.1 Executive Summary 163
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 164
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 165
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 166
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 167
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 168
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 168
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 169
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 170
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 170
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 171
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 172
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 173
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 174
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 175
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 175
9 SOUTHEAST 176
9.1 Executive Summary 176
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 178
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 179
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 180
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 181
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 182
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 183
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 184
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 185
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 189
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 195
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 196
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 198
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 202
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 203
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 204
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 205
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 206
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 207
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 208
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 209
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 210
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 211
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 212
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 214
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 216
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 217
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 218
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 219
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 220
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 221
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 222
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 223
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 225
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 227
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 228
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 228
10 SOUTHWEST 229
10.1 Executive Summary 229
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 230
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 231
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 232
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 233
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 234
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 234
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 235
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 236
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 237
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 238
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 239
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 243
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 248
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 248
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 249

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.