The 2016-2021 Outlook for Electric Freight Elevators Excluding Farm and Portable Elevators in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 464 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for electric freight elevators excluding farm and portable elevators across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,300 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of it’s state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for electric freight elevators excluding farm and portable elevators. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for electric freight elevators excluding farm and portable elevators in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 40
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 55
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 56
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 57
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 59
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 60
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 61
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 62
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 63
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 65
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 68
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 69
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 74
4 GREAT LAKES 79
4.1 Executive Summary 79
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 81
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 82
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 90
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 99
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 100
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 103
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 107
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 108
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 113
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 118
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 119
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 126
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 133
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 134
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 138
5 MID-ATLANTIC 142
5.1 Executive Summary 142
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 144
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 145
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 146
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 147
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 148
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 148
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 149
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 150
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 154
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 160
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 161
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 168
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 176
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 177
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 188
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 199
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 200
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 210
6 NEW ENGLAND 220
6.1 Executive Summary 220
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 222
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 223
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 226
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 230
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 231
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 232
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 234
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 235
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 240
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 246
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 247
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 248
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 250
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 251
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 252
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 253
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 254
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 254
7 PLAINS 256
7.1 Executive Summary 256
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 258
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 259
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 261
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 264
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 265
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 266
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 269
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 270
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 274
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 278
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 279
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 283
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 287
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 288
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 289
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 290
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 291
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 291
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 292
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 293
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 293
8 ROCKIES 295
8.1 Executive Summary 295
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 297
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 298
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 300
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 304
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 305
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 306
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 307
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 308
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 309
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 310
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 311
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 313
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 315
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 316
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 317
9 SOUTHEAST 318
9.1 Executive Summary 318
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 320
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 321
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 324
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 327
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 328
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 330
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 332
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 333
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 343
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 355
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 356
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 361
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 368
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 369
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 371
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 375
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 376
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 379
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 383
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 384
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 386
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 388
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 389
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 393
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 399
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 400
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 403
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 406
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 407
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 410
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 414
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 415
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 419
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 423
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 424
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 425
10 SOUTHWEST 427
10.1 Executive Summary 427
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 429
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 430
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 432
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 434
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 435
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 436
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 437
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 438
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 440
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 442
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 443
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 453
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 463
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 463
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 464

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.