The 2016-2021 Outlook for Finished Twill-Weave Manmade Fiber and Silk Broadwoven Fabrics Made from at Least 85-Percent Spun Yarn Finished in Weaving Mills Excluding Pile in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 459 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for finished twill-weave manmade fiber and silk broadwoven fabrics made from at least 85-percent spun yarn finished in weaving mills excluding pile across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,200 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for finished twill-weave manmade fiber and silk broadwoven fabrics made from at least 85-percent spun yarn finished in weaving mills excluding pile. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for finished twill-weave manmade fiber and silk broadwoven fabrics made from at least 85-percent spun yarn finished in weaving mills excluding pile in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 39
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 55
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 56
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 57
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 59
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 60
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 61
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 62
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 63
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 65
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 68
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 69
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 74
4 GREAT LAKES 79
4.1 Executive Summary 79
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 81
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 82
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 90
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 99
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 100
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 103
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 107
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 108
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 113
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 118
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 119
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 126
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 133
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 134
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 138
5 MID-ATLANTIC 142
5.1 Executive Summary 142
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 144
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 145
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 146
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 147
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 148
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 148
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 149
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 150
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 154
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 159
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 160
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 167
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 175
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 176
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 187
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 198
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 199
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 209
6 NEW ENGLAND 219
6.1 Executive Summary 219
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 221
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 222
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 225
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 229
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 230
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 231
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 232
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 233
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 238
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 244
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 245
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 246
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 248
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 249
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 250
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 251
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 252
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 252
7 PLAINS 254
7.1 Executive Summary 254
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 256
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 257
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 259
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 262
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 263
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 264
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 267
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 268
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 272
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 276
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 277
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 281
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 285
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 286
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 287
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 288
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 289
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 289
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 290
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 291
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 292
8 ROCKIES 293
8.1 Executive Summary 293
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 295
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 296
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 298
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 302
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 303
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 304
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 305
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 306
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 307
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 308
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 309
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 311
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 313
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 314
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 315
9 SOUTHEAST 316
9.1 Executive Summary 316
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 318
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 319
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 322
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 325
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 326
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 327
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 330
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 331
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 341
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 353
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 354
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 359
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 365
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 366
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 368
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 371
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 372
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 375
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 379
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 380
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 382
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 384
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 385
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 389
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 395
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 396
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 399
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 402
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 403
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 406
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 409
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 410
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 414
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 418
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 419
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 420
10 SOUTHWEST 422
10.1 Executive Summary 422
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 424
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 425
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 427
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 429
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 430
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 431
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 432
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 433
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 435
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 437
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 438
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 448
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 458
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 458
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 459

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.