The 2016-2021 Outlook for Anhydrous Milkfat Creamery Butter in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 620 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for anhydrous milkfat creamery butter across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 10,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for anhydrous milkfat creamery butter. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for anhydrous milkfat creamery butter in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 44
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 63
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 64
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 66
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 68
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 69
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 70
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 71
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 72
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 75
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 79
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 80
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 87
4 GREAT LAKES 94
4.1 Executive Summary 94
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 95
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 96
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 107
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 120
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 121
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 126
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 131
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 132
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 139
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 146
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 147
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 158
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 169
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 170
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 176
5 MID-ATLANTIC 184
5.1 Executive Summary 184
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 186
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 187
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 188
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 189
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 190
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 190
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 191
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 192
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 198
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 204
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 205
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 214
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 223
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 224
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 242
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 260
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 261
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 276
6 NEW ENGLAND 293
6.1 Executive Summary 293
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 295
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 296
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 300
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 305
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 306
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 309
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 312
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 313
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 320
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 327
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 328
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 330
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 333
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 334
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 335
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 336
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 337
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 338
7 PLAINS 340
7.1 Executive Summary 340
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 342
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 343
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 347
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 351
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 352
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 355
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 358
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 359
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 365
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 371
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 372
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 378
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 384
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 385
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 386
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 389
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 390
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 390
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 392
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 393
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 394
8 ROCKIES 395
8.1 Executive Summary 395
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 396
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 397
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 401
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 405
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 406
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 407
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 409
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 410
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 411
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 413
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 414
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 417
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 420
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 421
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 422
9 SOUTHEAST 423
9.1 Executive Summary 423
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 425
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 426
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 430
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 435
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 436
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 439
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 442
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 443
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 457
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 472
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 473
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 480
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 487
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 488
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 492
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 496
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 497
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 501
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 507
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 508
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 510
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 514
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 515
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 522
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 529
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 530
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 534
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 539
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 540
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 545
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 550
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 551
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 556
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 561
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 562
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 564
10 SOUTHWEST 566
10.1 Executive Summary 566
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 567
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 568
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 571
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 574
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 575
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 576
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 579
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 580
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 583
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 587
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 588
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 603
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 619
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 619
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 620

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.