The 2016-2021 Outlook for Canned Fruit Butter in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 471 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for canned fruit butter across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for canned fruit butter. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for canned fruit butter in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 16
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 18
3.1 Executive Summary 18
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 39
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 54
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 55
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 56
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 58
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 59
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 60
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 61
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 62
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 64
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 67
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 68
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 73
4 GREAT LAKES 78
4.1 Executive Summary 78
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 79
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 80
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 88
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 97
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 98
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 101
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 105
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 106
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 111
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 116
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 117
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 124
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 133
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 134
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 138
5 MID-ATLANTIC 142
5.1 Executive Summary 142
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 144
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 145
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 146
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 146
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 148
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 148
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 149
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 150
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 155
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 160
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 161
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 169
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 177
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 178
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 189
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 201
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 202
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 212
6 NEW ENGLAND 224
6.1 Executive Summary 224
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 226
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 227
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 230
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 234
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 235
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 236
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 238
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 239
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 244
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 251
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 252
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 253
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 256
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 257
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 258
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 259
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 260
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 260
7 PLAINS 262
7.1 Executive Summary 262
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 264
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 265
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 267
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 270
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 271
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 272
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 275
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 276
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 280
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 284
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 285
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 289
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 293
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 294
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 295
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 296
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 297
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 297
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 298
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 299
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 299
8 ROCKIES 301
8.1 Executive Summary 301
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 302
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 303
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 306
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 309
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 310
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 311
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 312
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 313
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 314
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 315
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 316
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 318
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 320
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 321
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 322
9 SOUTHEAST 323
9.1 Executive Summary 323
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 325
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 326
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 329
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 332
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 333
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 335
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 337
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 338
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 349
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 360
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 361
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 367
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 373
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 374
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 376
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 380
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 381
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 384
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 388
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 389
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 391
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 393
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 394
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 399
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 404
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 405
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 408
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 411
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 412
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 415
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 419
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 420
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 424
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 428
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 429
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 430
10 SOUTHWEST 433
10.1 Executive Summary 433
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 434
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 435
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 437
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 439
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 440
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 441
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 442
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 443
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 445
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 447
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 448
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 458
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 469
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 469
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 470

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.