The 2016-2021 Outlook for Food-Grade Dry Whole Milk Shipped in Bulk in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 712 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for food-grade dry whole milk shipped in bulk across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,500 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for food-grade dry whole milk shipped in bulk. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for food-grade dry whole milk shipped in bulk in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 46
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 70
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 73
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 74
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 75
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 77
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 78
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 82
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 86
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 87
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 94
4 GREAT LAKES 103
4.1 Executive Summary 103
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 104
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 105
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 119
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 133
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 134
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 140
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 148
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 149
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 158
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 167
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 168
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 181
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 195
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 196
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 205
5 MID-ATLANTIC 216
5.1 Executive Summary 216
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 218
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 219
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 220
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 221
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 222
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 222
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 223
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 224
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 230
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 237
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 238
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 247
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 258
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 259
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 283
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 308
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 309
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 326
6 NEW ENGLAND 343
6.1 Executive Summary 343
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 345
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 346
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 351
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 356
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 357
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 362
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 367
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 368
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 376
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 386
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 387
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 390
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 395
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 396
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 397
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 398
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 399
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 401
7 PLAINS 405
7.1 Executive Summary 405
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 407
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 408
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 413
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 418
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 419
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 422
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 426
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 427
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 434
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 441
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 442
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 448
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 455
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 456
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 458
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 460
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 461
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 461
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 463
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 464
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 465
8 ROCKIES 466
8.1 Executive Summary 466
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 467
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 468
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 472
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 476
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 477
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 478
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 481
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 482
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 483
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 486
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 487
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 490
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 494
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 495
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 496
9 SOUTHEAST 497
9.1 Executive Summary 497
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 499
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 500
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 505
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 511
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 512
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 515
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 519
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 520
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 536
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 552
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 553
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 560
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 567
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 568
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 572
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 577
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 578
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 583
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 588
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 589
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 592
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 595
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 596
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 603
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 612
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 613
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 618
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 623
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 624
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 629
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 635
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 636
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 641
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 646
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 647
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 649
10 SOUTHWEST 651
10.1 Executive Summary 651
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 652
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 653
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 656
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 660
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 661
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 663
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 665
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 666
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 670
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 674
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 675
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 693
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 711
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 711
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 712

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.