The 2016-2021 Outlook for Nonfat Dry Milk Shipped in Consumer Packages Weighing 3 Pounds or Less in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 702 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for nonfat dry milk shipped in consumer packages weighing 3 pounds or less across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,200 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for nonfat dry milk shipped in consumer packages weighing 3 pounds or less. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for nonfat dry milk shipped in consumer packages weighing 3 pounds or less in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 46
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 66
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 67
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 69
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 72
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 73
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 74
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 76
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 77
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 81
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 85
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 86
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 93
4 GREAT LAKES 102
4.1 Executive Summary 102
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 104
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 105
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 118
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 133
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 134
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 140
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 147
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 148
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 157
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 166
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 167
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 180
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 193
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 194
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 203
5 MID-ATLANTIC 212
5.1 Executive Summary 212
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 214
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 215
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 216
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 217
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 218
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 218
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 219
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 220
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 226
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 233
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 234
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 244
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 254
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 255
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 278
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 301
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 302
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 319
6 NEW ENGLAND 336
6.1 Executive Summary 336
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 338
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 339
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 344
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 349
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 350
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 354
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 359
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 360
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 368
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 377
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 378
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 381
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 385
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 386
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 387
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 388
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 389
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 391
7 PLAINS 394
7.1 Executive Summary 394
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 396
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 397
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 402
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 407
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 408
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 411
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 415
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 416
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 423
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 430
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 431
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 437
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 444
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 445
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 447
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 449
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 450
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 451
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 452
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 453
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 454
8 ROCKIES 455
8.1 Executive Summary 455
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 457
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 458
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 462
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 466
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 467
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 468
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 471
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 472
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 473
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 476
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 477
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 480
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 483
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 484
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 485
9 SOUTHEAST 486
9.1 Executive Summary 486
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 488
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 489
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 494
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 499
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 500
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 503
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 508
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 509
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 525
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 541
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 542
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 549
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 556
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 557
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 561
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 566
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 567
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 572
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 577
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 578
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 581
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 584
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 585
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 593
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 601
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 602
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 607
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 612
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 613
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 618
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 624
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 625
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 630
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 635
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 636
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 638
10 SOUTHWEST 640
10.1 Executive Summary 640
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 642
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 643
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 646
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 650
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 651
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 653
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 655
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 656
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 660
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 664
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 665
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 682
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 701
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 701
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 702

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.