The 2016-2021 Outlook for Packaged U.H.T. Skim Milk in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 618 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for packaged U.H.T. skim milk across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 10,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for packaged U.H.T. skim milk. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for packaged U.H.T. skim milk in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 42
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 62
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 63
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 65
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 67
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 68
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 69
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 70
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 71
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 74
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 78
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 79
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 86
4 GREAT LAKES 93
4.1 Executive Summary 93
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 94
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 95
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 106
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 119
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 120
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 125
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 130
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 131
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 138
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 145
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 146
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 157
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 168
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 169
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 175
5 MID-ATLANTIC 183
5.1 Executive Summary 183
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 185
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 186
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 187
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 188
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 189
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 189
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 190
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 191
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 197
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 203
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 204
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 213
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 222
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 223
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 240
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 259
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 260
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 275
6 NEW ENGLAND 292
6.1 Executive Summary 292
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 294
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 295
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 299
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 304
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 305
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 307
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 311
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 312
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 319
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 326
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 327
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 329
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 332
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 333
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 334
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 335
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 336
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 337
7 PLAINS 339
7.1 Executive Summary 339
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 341
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 342
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 346
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 350
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 351
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 354
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 357
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 358
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 364
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 370
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 371
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 377
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 383
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 384
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 385
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 387
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 388
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 388
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 390
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 391
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 392
8 ROCKIES 393
8.1 Executive Summary 393
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 394
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 395
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 398
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 403
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 404
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 405
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 407
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 408
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 409
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 411
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 412
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 415
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 418
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 419
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 420
9 SOUTHEAST 421
9.1 Executive Summary 421
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 423
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 424
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 428
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 433
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 434
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 437
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 440
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 441
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 455
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 470
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 471
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 478
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 485
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 486
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 490
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 494
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 495
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 499
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 505
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 506
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 508
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 512
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 513
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 520
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 527
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 528
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 532
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 537
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 538
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 543
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 548
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 549
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 554
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 559
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 560
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 562
10 SOUTHWEST 564
10.1 Executive Summary 564
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 565
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 566
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 569
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 572
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 573
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 574
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 577
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 578
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 581
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 585
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 586
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 601
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 616
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 616
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 617

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.