The 2016-2021 Outlook for U.H.T. Fluid Whole Milk in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 696 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for U.H.T. fluid whole milk across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,300 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for U.H.T. fluid whole milk. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for U.H.T. fluid whole milk in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 45
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 65
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 66
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 68
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 70
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 71
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 72
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 74
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 75
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 79
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 83
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 84
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 91
4 GREAT LAKES 99
4.1 Executive Summary 99
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 100
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 101
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 114
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 129
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 130
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 136
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 143
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 144
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 153
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 162
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 163
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 176
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 189
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 190
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 199
5 MID-ATLANTIC 208
5.1 Executive Summary 208
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 210
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 211
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 212
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 213
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 214
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 214
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 215
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 216
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 222
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 229
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 230
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 239
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 250
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 251
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 274
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 298
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 299
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 316
6 NEW ENGLAND 333
6.1 Executive Summary 333
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 335
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 336
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 341
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 346
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 347
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 351
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 356
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 357
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 365
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 374
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 375
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 378
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 382
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 383
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 384
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 385
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 386
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 388
7 PLAINS 391
7.1 Executive Summary 391
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 393
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 394
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 399
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 404
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 405
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 408
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 412
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 413
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 420
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 427
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 428
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 434
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 441
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 442
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 444
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 446
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 447
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 447
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 449
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 450
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 451
8 ROCKIES 452
8.1 Executive Summary 452
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 453
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 454
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 458
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 462
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 463
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 464
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 467
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 468
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 469
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 471
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 472
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 475
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 478
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 479
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 480
9 SOUTHEAST 481
9.1 Executive Summary 481
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 483
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 484
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 489
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 494
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 495
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 498
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 502
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 503
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 519
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 535
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 536
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 543
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 550
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 551
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 555
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 560
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 561
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 566
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 571
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 572
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 575
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 578
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 579
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 586
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 595
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 596
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 601
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 606
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 607
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 612
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 618
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 619
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 624
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 629
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 630
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 632
10 SOUTHWEST 634
10.1 Executive Summary 634
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 635
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 636
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 639
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 643
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 644
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 646
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 648
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 649
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 653
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 657
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 658
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 675
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 694
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 694
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 695

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.