The 2016-2021 Outlook for Canned Red-Pitted Cherries in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 308 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for canned red-pitted cherries across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 4,100 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of it’s state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for canned red-pitted cherries. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for canned red-pitted cherries in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 21
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 22
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 23
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 33
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 45
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 46
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 46
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 48
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 49
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 49
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 51
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 52
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 53
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 55
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 56
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 59
4 GREAT LAKES 62
4.1 Executive Summary 62
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 63
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 64
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 69
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 74
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 75
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 77
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 79
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 80
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 83
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 86
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 87
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 91
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 96
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 97
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 99
5 MID-ATLANTIC 101
5.1 Executive Summary 101
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 103
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 104
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 104
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 105
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 106
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 106
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 107
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 108
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 111
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 114
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 115
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 120
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 125
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 126
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 131
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 138
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 139
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 143
6 NEW ENGLAND 147
6.1 Executive Summary 147
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 149
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 150
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 152
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 155
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 156
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 156
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 157
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 158
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 161
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 166
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 167
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 167
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 168
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 169
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 170
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 171
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 172
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 172
7 PLAINS 173
7.1 Executive Summary 173
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 175
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 176
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 177
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 178
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 179
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 180
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 181
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 182
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 184
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 187
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 188
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 190
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 192
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 193
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 193
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 194
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 195
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 195
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 196
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 197
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 197
8 ROCKIES 198
8.1 Executive Summary 198
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 199
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 200
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 201
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 203
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 204
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 204
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 206
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 207
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 207
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 208
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 209
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 210
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 212
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 213
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 213
9 SOUTHEAST 214
9.1 Executive Summary 214
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 216
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 217
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 218
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 220
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 221
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 222
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 223
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 224
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 230
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 237
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 238
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 241
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 245
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 246
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 247
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 249
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 250
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 251
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 254
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 255
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 256
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 257
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 258
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 260
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 263
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 264
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 265
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 268
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 269
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 270
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 273
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 274
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 277
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 280
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 281
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 282
10 SOUTHWEST 283
10.1 Executive Summary 283
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 284
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 285
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 286
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 288
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 289
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 289
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 290
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 291
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 292
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 293
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 294
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 300
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 306
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 306
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 307

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.