The 2016-2021 Outlook for Canned Vegetarian-Style Dry Beans with Sauce Weighing 13.1 to 18 Ounces in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 586 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for canned vegetarian-style dry beans with sauce weighing 13.1 to 18 ounces across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 9,800 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of it’s state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for canned vegetarian-style dry beans with sauce weighing 13.1 to 18 ounces. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for canned vegetarian-style dry beans with sauce weighing 13.1 to 18 ounces in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 43
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 61
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 62
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 64
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 66
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 67
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 68
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 69
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 70
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 73
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 76
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 77
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 83
4 GREAT LAKES 90
4.1 Executive Summary 90
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 92
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 93
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 104
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 115
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 116
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 120
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 125
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 126
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 132
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 140
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 141
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 151
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 161
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 162
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 168
5 MID-ATLANTIC 174
5.1 Executive Summary 174
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 176
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 177
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 178
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 179
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 180
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 180
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 181
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 182
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 187
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 194
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 195
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 204
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 213
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 214
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 230
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 246
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 247
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 262
6 NEW ENGLAND 277
6.1 Executive Summary 277
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 279
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 280
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 284
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 289
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 290
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 292
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 294
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 295
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 302
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 309
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 310
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 312
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 315
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 316
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 317
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 318
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 319
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 320
7 PLAINS 321
7.1 Executive Summary 321
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 323
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 324
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 327
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 331
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 332
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 334
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 337
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 338
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 343
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 349
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 350
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 355
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 361
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 362
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 363
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 365
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 366
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 367
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 368
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 369
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 370
8 ROCKIES 371
8.1 Executive Summary 371
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 373
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 374
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 377
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 381
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 382
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 383
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 385
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 386
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 387
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 388
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 389
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 391
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 395
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 396
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 397
9 SOUTHEAST 398
9.1 Executive Summary 398
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 400
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 401
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 405
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 409
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 410
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 413
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 416
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 417
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 430
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 445
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 446
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 452
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 460
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 461
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 464
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 468
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 469
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 473
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 478
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 479
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 481
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 485
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 486
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 492
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 500
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 501
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 505
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 510
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 511
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 515
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 520
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 521
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 526
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 531
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 532
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 534
10 SOUTHWEST 536
10.1 Executive Summary 536
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 538
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 539
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 542
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 545
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 546
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 547
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 549
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 550
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 553
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 556
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 557
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 571
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 585
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 585
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 586

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.