The 2016-2021 Outlook for Food-Grade Concentrated Solid Whey Shipped in Bulk Excluding Ice Cream Mixes in the United States

 Published On: Aug, 2015 |    No of Pages: 737 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for food-grade concentrated solid whey shipped in bulk excluding ice cream mixes across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,800 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for food-grade concentrated solid whey shipped in bulk excluding ice cream mixes. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for food-grade concentrated solid whey shipped in bulk excluding ice cream mixes in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 49
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 69
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 70
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 74
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 77
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 78
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 81
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 83
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 84
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 89
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 93
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 94
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 103
4 GREAT LAKES 111
4.1 Executive Summary 111
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 112
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 113
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 127
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 140
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 141
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 148
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 154
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 155
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 165
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 174
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 175
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 188
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 200
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 201
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 210
5 MID-ATLANTIC 218
5.1 Executive Summary 218
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 220
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 221
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 223
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 224
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 225
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 225
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 226
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 227
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 235
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 242
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 243
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 254
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 264
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 265
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 287
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 308
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 309
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 327
6 NEW ENGLAND 344
6.1 Executive Summary 344
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 346
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 347
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 353
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 358
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 359
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 364
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 368
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 369
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 378
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 386
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 387
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 391
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 394
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 395
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 397
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 398
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 399
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 402
7 PLAINS 404
7.1 Executive Summary 404
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 406
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 407
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 413
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 418
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 419
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 424
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 428
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 429
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 437
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 444
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 445
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 453
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 460
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 461
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 464
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 466
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 467
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 469
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 470
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 471
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 473
8 ROCKIES 474
8.1 Executive Summary 474
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 475
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 476
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 481
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 485
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 486
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 489
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 491
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 492
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 495
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 497
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 498
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 502
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 505
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 506
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 508
9 SOUTHEAST 509
9.1 Executive Summary 509
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 511
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 512
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 518
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 523
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 524
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 529
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 533
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 534
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 550
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 565
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 566
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 574
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 581
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 582
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 587
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 591
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 592
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 598
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 603
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 604
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 608
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 611
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 612
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 621
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 629
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 630
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 636
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 641
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 642
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 649
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 655
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 656
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 662
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 667
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 668
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 671
10 SOUTHWEST 673
10.1 Executive Summary 673
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 674
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 675
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 680
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 684
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 685
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 688
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 690
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 691
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 696
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 700
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 701
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 719
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 736
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 736
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 737

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.