The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wheat Mill Products Excluding Flour and Mill Feed in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 713 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wheat mill products excluding flour and mill feed across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wheat mill products excluding flour and mill feed. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wheat mill products excluding flour and mill feed in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 27
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 47
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 66
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 67
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 70
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 72
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 73
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 76
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 78
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 79
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 84
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 88
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 89
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 97
4 GREAT LAKES 105
4.1 Executive Summary 105
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 106
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 107
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 121
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 134
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 135
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 142
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 148
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 149
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 158
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 166
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 167
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 180
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 192
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 193
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 202
5 MID-ATLANTIC 210
5.1 Executive Summary 210
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 211
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 212
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 214
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 215
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 216
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 216
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 217
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 218
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 225
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 231
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 232
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 243
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 253
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 254
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 275
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 295
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 296
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 313
6 NEW ENGLAND 330
6.1 Executive Summary 330
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 332
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 333
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 339
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 344
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 345
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 350
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 354
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 355
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 364
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 372
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 373
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 377
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 380
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 381
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 383
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 384
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 385
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 388
7 PLAINS 390
7.1 Executive Summary 390
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 392
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 393
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 399
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 404
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 405
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 409
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 412
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 413
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 421
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 428
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 429
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 436
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 442
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 443
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 446
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 448
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 449
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 451
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 452
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 453
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 455
8 ROCKIES 456
8.1 Executive Summary 456
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 457
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 458
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 463
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 467
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 468
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 471
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 473
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 474
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 477
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 479
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 480
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 484
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 487
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 488
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 490
9 SOUTHEAST 491
9.1 Executive Summary 491
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 493
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 494
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 500
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 505
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 506
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 511
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 515
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 516
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 532
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 547
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 548
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 556
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 563
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 564
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 569
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 573
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 574
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 580
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 585
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 586
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 590
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 593
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 594
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 603
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 611
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 612
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 618
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 623
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 624
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 630
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 635
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 636
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 642
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 647
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 648
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 651
10 SOUTHWEST 653
10.1 Executive Summary 653
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 654
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 655
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 659
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 662
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 663
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 666
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 668
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 669
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 674
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 678
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 679
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 696
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 712
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 712
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 713

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.