The 2016-2021 Outlook for Whole and Parts of Ducks in the United States

 Published On: Aug, 2015 |    No of Pages: 568 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for whole and parts of ducks across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 8,400 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for whole and parts of ducks. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for whole and parts of ducks in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 42
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 58
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 59
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 62
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 64
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 65
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 67
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 68
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 69
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 73
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 76
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 77
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 84
4 GREAT LAKES 90
4.1 Executive Summary 90
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 91
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 92
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 102
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 111
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 112
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 117
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 121
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 122
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 129
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 135
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 136
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 146
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 155
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 156
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 162
5 MID-ATLANTIC 167
5.1 Executive Summary 167
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 168
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 169
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 171
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 172
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 173
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 173
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 174
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 175
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 181
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 186
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 187
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 196
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 204
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 205
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 219
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 232
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 233
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 246
6 NEW ENGLAND 258
6.1 Executive Summary 258
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 259
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 260
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 265
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 269
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 270
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 273
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 275
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 276
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 283
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 289
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 290
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 293
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 295
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 296
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 298
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 299
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 300
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 302
7 PLAINS 303
7.1 Executive Summary 303
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 305
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 306
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 310
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 313
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 314
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 317
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 319
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 320
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 326
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 331
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 332
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 338
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 343
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 344
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 347
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 349
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 350
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 352
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 353
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 354
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 356
8 ROCKIES 357
8.1 Executive Summary 357
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 358
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 359
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 363
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 366
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 367
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 369
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 370
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 371
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 373
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 374
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 375
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 379
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 382
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 383
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 385
9 SOUTHEAST 386
9.1 Executive Summary 386
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 388
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 389
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 394
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 398
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 399
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 402
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 404
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 405
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 418
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 430
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 431
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 438
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 444
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 445
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 449
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 452
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 453
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 458
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 462
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 463
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 467
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 470
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 471
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 478
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 484
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 485
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 490
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 494
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 495
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 500
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 504
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 505
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 510
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 514
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 515
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 518
10 SOUTHWEST 520
10.1 Executive Summary 520
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 521
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 522
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 526
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 529
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 530
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 533
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 535
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 536
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 540
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 543
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 544
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 556
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 567
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 567
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 568

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.