The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's and Girls' Belts Excluding Leather Belts in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 421 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's and girls' belts excluding leather belts across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 5,400 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's and girls' belts excluding leather belts. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's and girls' belts excluding leather belts in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 38
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 50
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 51
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 53
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 54
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 55
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 57
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 58
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 59
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 62
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 64
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 65
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 70
4 GREAT LAKES 74
4.1 Executive Summary 74
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 75
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 76
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 83
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 89
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 90
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 94
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 97
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 98
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 103
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 107
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 108
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 114
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 119
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 120
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 124
5 MID-ATLANTIC 127
5.1 Executive Summary 127
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 128
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 129
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 131
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 132
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 133
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 133
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 134
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 135
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 140
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 144
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 145
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 152
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 158
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 159
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 167
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 174
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 175
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 182
6 NEW ENGLAND 188
6.1 Executive Summary 188
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 189
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 190
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 194
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 197
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 198
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 200
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 201
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 202
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 207
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 212
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 213
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 215
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 216
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 217
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 219
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 220
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 221
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 223
7 PLAINS 224
7.1 Executive Summary 224
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 226
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 227
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 230
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 232
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 233
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 235
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 236
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 237
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 241
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 244
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 245
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 249
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 252
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 253
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 255
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 256
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 257
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 259
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 260
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 261
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 263
8 ROCKIES 264
8.1 Executive Summary 264
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 265
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 266
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 269
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 271
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 272
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 274
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 275
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 276
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 278
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 279
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 280
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 283
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 285
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 286
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 288
9 SOUTHEAST 289
9.1 Executive Summary 289
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 291
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 292
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 295
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 297
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 298
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 301
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 303
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 304
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 313
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 321
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 322
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 327
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 331
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 332
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 335
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 337
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 338
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 342
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 345
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 346
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 349
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 351
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 352
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 356
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 359
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 360
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 363
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 365
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 366
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 370
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 373
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 374
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 379
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 383
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 384
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 386
10 SOUTHWEST 387
10.1 Executive Summary 387
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 388
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 389
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 392
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 394
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 395
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 397
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 398
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 399
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 402
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 404
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 405
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 413
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 420
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 420
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 421

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.