The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's and Girls' Corsets, Girdles, and Combinations Made from Purchased Fabrics Excluding Surgical Corsets in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 711 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's and girls' corsets, girdles, and combinations made from purchased fabrics excluding surgical corsets across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,200 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's and girls' corsets, girdles, and combinations made from purchased fabrics excluding surgical corsets. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's and girls' corsets, girdles, and combinations made from purchased fabrics excluding surgical corsets in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 73
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 74
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 77
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 79
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 80
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 85
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 89
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 90
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 98
4 GREAT LAKES 105
4.1 Executive Summary 105
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 107
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 108
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 121
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 133
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 134
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 141
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 147
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 148
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 157
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 165
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 166
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 179
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 191
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 192
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 201
5 MID-ATLANTIC 209
5.1 Executive Summary 209
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 211
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 212
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 214
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 215
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 216
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 216
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 217
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 218
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 225
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 231
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 232
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 243
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 253
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 254
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 274
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 293
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 294
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 311
6 NEW ENGLAND 327
6.1 Executive Summary 327
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 329
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 330
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 336
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 341
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 342
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 347
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 351
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 352
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 361
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 369
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 370
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 374
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 377
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 378
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 380
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 381
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 382
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 385
7 PLAINS 387
7.1 Executive Summary 387
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 389
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 390
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 396
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 401
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 402
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 406
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 409
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 410
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 418
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 425
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 426
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 433
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 439
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 440
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 443
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 445
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 446
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 448
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 449
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 450
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 452
8 ROCKIES 453
8.1 Executive Summary 453
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 455
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 456
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 461
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 465
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 466
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 469
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 471
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 472
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 475
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 477
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 478
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 482
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 485
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 486
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 488
9 SOUTHEAST 489
9.1 Executive Summary 489
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 491
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 492
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 498
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 503
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 504
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 509
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 513
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 514
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 530
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 545
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 546
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 554
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 561
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 562
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 567
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 571
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 572
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 578
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 583
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 584
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 588
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 591
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 592
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 601
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 609
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 610
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 616
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 621
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 622
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 628
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 633
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 634
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 640
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 645
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 646
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 649
10 SOUTHWEST 651
10.1 Executive Summary 651
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 652
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 653
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 657
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 660
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 661
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 664
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 666
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 667
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 672
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 676
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 677
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 694
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 710
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 710
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 711

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.