The 2016-2021 Outlook for Assembled Unpainted Wood Furniture Excluding Custom Furniture Sold at Retail Directly to the Customer in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 651 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for assembled unpainted wood furniture excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,200 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for assembled unpainted wood furniture excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for assembled unpainted wood furniture excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 45
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 65
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 66
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 68
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 70
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 71
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 72
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 74
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 75
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 78
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 82
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 83
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 90
4 GREAT LAKES 97
4.1 Executive Summary 97
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 99
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 100
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 112
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 125
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 126
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 131
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 137
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 138
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 146
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 154
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 155
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 166
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 179
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 180
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 187
5 MID-ATLANTIC 195
5.1 Executive Summary 195
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 197
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 198
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 199
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 200
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 201
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 201
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 202
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 203
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 209
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 215
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 216
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 225
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 235
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 236
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 255
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 275
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 276
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 292
6 NEW ENGLAND 309
6.1 Executive Summary 309
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 311
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 312
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 316
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 321
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 322
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 325
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 329
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 330
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 337
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 345
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 346
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 349
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 352
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 353
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 354
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 355
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 356
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 358
7 PLAINS 360
7.1 Executive Summary 360
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 362
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 363
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 367
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 372
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 373
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 376
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 379
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 380
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 386
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 393
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 394
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 400
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 406
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 407
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 409
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 411
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 412
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 413
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 414
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 415
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 416
8 ROCKIES 417
8.1 Executive Summary 417
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 419
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 420
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 424
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 428
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 429
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 430
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 432
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 433
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 434
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 436
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 437
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 440
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 443
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 444
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 445
9 SOUTHEAST 446
9.1 Executive Summary 446
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 448
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 449
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 453
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 459
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 460
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 463
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 467
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 468
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 483
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 498
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 499
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 506
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 513
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 514
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 518
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 522
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 523
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 527
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 533
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 534
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 537
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 540
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 541
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 548
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 556
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 557
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 561
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 567
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 568
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 573
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 578
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 579
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 584
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 589
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 590
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 592
10 SOUTHWEST 594
10.1 Executive Summary 594
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 596
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 597
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 600
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 603
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 604
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 606
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 608
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 609
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 612
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 617
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 618
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 634
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 650
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 650
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 651

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.