The 2016-2021 Outlook for Bamboo, Rattan, Willow, and Chip Basketwork, Wickerwork, and Related Products of Fibrous Vegetable Substances Excluding Furniture and Laundry Hampers in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 475 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for bamboo, rattan, willow, and chip basketwork, wickerwork, and related products of fibrous vegetable substances excluding furniture and laundry hampers across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,200 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for bamboo, rattan, willow, and chip basketwork, wickerwork, and related products of fibrous vegetable substances excluding furniture and laundry hampers. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for bamboo, rattan, willow, and chip basketwork, wickerwork, and related products of fibrous vegetable substances excluding furniture and laundry hampers in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 40
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 55
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 56
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 57
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 59
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 60
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 61
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 62
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 63
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 65
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 68
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 69
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 74
4 GREAT LAKES 79
4.1 Executive Summary 79
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 81
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 82
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 90
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 99
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 100
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 103
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 107
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 108
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 113
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 118
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 119
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 126
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 133
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 134
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 138
5 MID-ATLANTIC 142
5.1 Executive Summary 142
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 144
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 145
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 146
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 147
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 148
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 148
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 149
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 150
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 154
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 159
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 160
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 167
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 176
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 177
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 188
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 199
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 201
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 211
6 NEW ENGLAND 221
6.1 Executive Summary 221
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 223
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 224
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 227
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 231
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 232
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 233
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 235
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 237
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 242
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 248
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 250
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 251
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 254
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 256
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 257
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 258
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 259
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 259
7 PLAINS 261
7.1 Executive Summary 261
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 263
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 264
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 266
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 269
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 270
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 271
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 274
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 275
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 279
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 283
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 284
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 288
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 292
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 293
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 294
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 295
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 297
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 297
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 298
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 300
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 301
8 ROCKIES 302
8.1 Executive Summary 302
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 304
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 305
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 307
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 311
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 312
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 313
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 314
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 315
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 316
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 317
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 318
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 320
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 322
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 323
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 324
9 SOUTHEAST 325
9.1 Executive Summary 325
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 327
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 328
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 331
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 334
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 335
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 336
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 339
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 340
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 350
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 362
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 363
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 368
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 375
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 376
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 378
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 381
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 382
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 385
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 389
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 390
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 392
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 394
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 396
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 400
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 406
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 408
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 411
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 414
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 415
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 418
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 422
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 423
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 427
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 431
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 433
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 434
10 SOUTHWEST 437
10.1 Executive Summary 437
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 439
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 440
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 442
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 444
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 445
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 446
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 447
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 449
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 451
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 453
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 454
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 464
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 474
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 474
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 475

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.