The 2016-2021 Outlook for Custom Non-Upholstered Wood Household Furniture Sold Directly to the Customer at Retail Excluding Kitchen Cabinets, Bathroom Vanities, and Related Cabinetwork in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 776 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for custom non-upholstered wood household furniture sold directly to the customer at retail excluding kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and related cabinetwork across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for custom non-upholstered wood household furniture sold directly to the customer at retail excluding kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and related cabinetwork. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for custom non-upholstered wood household furniture sold directly to the customer at retail excluding kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and related cabinetwork in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 16
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 18
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 20
3.1 Executive Summary 20
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 22
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 24
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 29
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 50
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 71
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 73
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 75
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 78
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 80
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 81
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 83
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 85
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 89
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 93
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 95
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 103
4 GREAT LAKES 111
4.1 Executive Summary 111
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 113
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 115
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 129
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 144
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 146
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 153
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 160
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 162
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 171
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 180
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 181
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 194
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 208
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 210
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 220
5 MID-ATLANTIC 230
5.1 Executive Summary 230
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 232
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 234
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 235
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 236
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 237
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 237
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 238
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 240
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 246
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 253
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 255
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 265
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 275
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 277
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 302
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 329
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 331
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 348
6 NEW ENGLAND 365
6.1 Executive Summary 365
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 367
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 369
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 374
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 379
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 381
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 386
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 392
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 394
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 403
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 412
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 414
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 418
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 422
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 424
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 425
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 427
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 429
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 432
7 PLAINS 435
7.1 Executive Summary 435
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 437
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 438
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 443
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 448
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 450
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 453
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 458
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 460
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 467
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 474
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 476
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 482
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 489
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 491
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 493
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 495
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 497
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 498
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 499
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 501
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 502
8 ROCKIES 503
8.1 Executive Summary 503
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 505
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 507
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 511
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 516
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 518
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 520
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 522
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 524
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 525
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 528
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 529
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 532
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 537
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 539
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 540
9 SOUTHEAST 541
9.1 Executive Summary 541
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 543
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 545
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 550
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 556
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 558
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 561
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 566
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 568
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 584
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 600
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 602
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 609
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 616
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 618
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 622
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 627
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 629
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 634
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 639
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 641
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 644
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 647
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 649
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 657
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 665
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 667
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 672
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 677
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 679
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 684
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 690
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 692
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 697
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 702
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 704
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 706
10 SOUTHWEST 708
10.1 Executive Summary 708
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 710
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 712
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 715
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 720
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 722
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 724
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 726
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 728
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 732
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 736
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 738
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 756
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 775
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 775
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 776

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.