The 2016-2021 Outlook for Custom Upholstered Wood Household Furniture Sold Directly to the Customer at Retail Excluding Dining Room and Kitchen Chairs with Upholstered Seats or Backs in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 773 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for custom upholstered wood household furniture sold directly to the customer at retail excluding dining room and kitchen chairs with upholstered seats or backs across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for custom upholstered wood household furniture sold directly to the customer at retail excluding dining room and kitchen chairs with upholstered seats or backs. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for custom upholstered wood household furniture sold directly to the customer at retail excluding dining room and kitchen chairs with upholstered seats or backs in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 23
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 49
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 70
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 72
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 74
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 77
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 79
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 80
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 82
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 84
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 88
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 92
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 94
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 102
4 GREAT LAKES 110
4.1 Executive Summary 110
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 112
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 114
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 128
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 143
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 145
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 152
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 159
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 161
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 170
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 179
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 180
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 193
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 207
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 209
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 219
5 MID-ATLANTIC 229
5.1 Executive Summary 229
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 231
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 233
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 234
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 235
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 236
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 236
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 237
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 239
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 245
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 252
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 254
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 264
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 274
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 276
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 301
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 328
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 330
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 347
6 NEW ENGLAND 364
6.1 Executive Summary 364
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 366
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 368
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 373
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 378
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 380
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 385
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 391
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 393
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 402
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 411
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 413
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 417
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 421
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 423
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 424
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 426
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 428
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 431
7 PLAINS 434
7.1 Executive Summary 434
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 436
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 437
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 442
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 447
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 449
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 452
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 457
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 459
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 466
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 473
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 475
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 481
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 488
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 490
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 492
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 494
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 496
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 497
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 498
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 500
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 501
8 ROCKIES 502
8.1 Executive Summary 502
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 504
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 506
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 510
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 515
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 516
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 518
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 520
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 522
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 523
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 526
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 527
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 530
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 535
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 537
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 538
9 SOUTHEAST 539
9.1 Executive Summary 539
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 541
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 543
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 548
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 554
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 556
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 559
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 564
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 566
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 582
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 598
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 600
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 607
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 614
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 616
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 620
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 625
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 627
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 632
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 637
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 639
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 642
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 645
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 647
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 655
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 663
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 665
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 670
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 675
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 677
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 682
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 688
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 690
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 695
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 700
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 702
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 704
10 SOUTHWEST 706
10.1 Executive Summary 706
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 708
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 710
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 713
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 718
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 720
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 722
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 724
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 726
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 730
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 734
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 735
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 753
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 772
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 772
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 773

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.