The 2016-2021 Outlook for Fabric and Glass Woven Draperies Excluding Custom Made Draperies in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 726 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for fabric and glass woven draperies excluding custom made draperies across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for fabric and glass woven draperies excluding custom made draperies. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for fabric and glass woven draperies excluding custom made draperies in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 47
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 68
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 69
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 74
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 75
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 76
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 78
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 79
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 83
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 87
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 88
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 95
4 GREAT LAKES 104
4.1 Executive Summary 104
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 106
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 107
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 121
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 136
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 137
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 143
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 151
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 152
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 161
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 170
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 171
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 184
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 198
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 199
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 209
5 MID-ATLANTIC 219
5.1 Executive Summary 219
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 221
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 222
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 223
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 224
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 225
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 225
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 226
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 227
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 233
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 240
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 241
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 251
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 261
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 262
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 287
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 314
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 315
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 332
6 NEW ENGLAND 349
6.1 Executive Summary 349
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 351
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 352
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 357
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 362
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 363
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 368
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 374
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 375
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 384
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 393
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 394
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 398
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 402
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 403
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 404
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 406
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 407
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 410
7 PLAINS 413
7.1 Executive Summary 413
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 415
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 416
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 421
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 426
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 427
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 430
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 434
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 435
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 442
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 449
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 450
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 456
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 463
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 464
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 466
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 468
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 469
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 470
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 471
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 472
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 473
8 ROCKIES 474
8.1 Executive Summary 474
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 476
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 477
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 481
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 486
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 487
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 488
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 491
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 492
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 493
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 496
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 497
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 500
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 504
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 505
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 506
9 SOUTHEAST 507
9.1 Executive Summary 507
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 509
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 510
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 515
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 521
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 522
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 525
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 530
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 531
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 547
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 563
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 564
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 571
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 578
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 579
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 583
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 588
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 589
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 594
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 599
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 600
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 603
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 606
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 607
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 615
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 623
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 624
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 629
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 634
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 635
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 640
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 646
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 647
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 652
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 657
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 658
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 660
10 SOUTHWEST 662
10.1 Executive Summary 662
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 664
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 665
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 668
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 673
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 674
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 676
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 678
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 679
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 683
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 687
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 688
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 706
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 725
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 725
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 726

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.