The 2016-2021 Outlook for Library Furniture in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 715 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for library furniture across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for library furniture. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for library furniture in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 46
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 68
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 69
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 74
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 75
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 76
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 78
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 79
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 83
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 87
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 88
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 95
4 GREAT LAKES 104
4.1 Executive Summary 104
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 105
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 106
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 120
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 134
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 135
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 141
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 149
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 150
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 159
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 168
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 169
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 182
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 196
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 197
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 207
5 MID-ATLANTIC 217
5.1 Executive Summary 217
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 219
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 220
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 221
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 222
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 223
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 223
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 224
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 225
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 231
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 238
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 239
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 248
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 259
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 260
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 285
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 310
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 311
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 328
6 NEW ENGLAND 345
6.1 Executive Summary 345
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 347
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 348
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 353
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 358
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 359
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 364
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 369
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 370
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 378
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 388
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 389
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 392
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 397
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 398
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 399
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 400
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 401
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 403
7 PLAINS 407
7.1 Executive Summary 407
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 409
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 410
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 415
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 420
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 421
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 424
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 428
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 429
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 436
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 443
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 444
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 450
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 457
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 458
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 460
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 462
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 463
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 463
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 465
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 466
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 467
8 ROCKIES 468
8.1 Executive Summary 468
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 469
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 470
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 474
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 478
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 479
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 480
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 483
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 484
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 485
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 488
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 489
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 492
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 496
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 497
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 498
9 SOUTHEAST 499
9.1 Executive Summary 499
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 501
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 502
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 507
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 513
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 514
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 517
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 521
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 522
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 538
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 554
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 555
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 562
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 569
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 570
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 574
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 579
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 580
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 585
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 590
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 591
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 594
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 597
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 598
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 605
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 614
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 615
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 620
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 625
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 626
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 631
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 637
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 638
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 643
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 648
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 649
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 651
10 SOUTHWEST 653
10.1 Executive Summary 653
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 654
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 655
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 658
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 662
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 663
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 665
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 667
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 668
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 672
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 676
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 677
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 695
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 714
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 714
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 715

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.