The 2016-2021 Outlook for Non-Electric Complete Lighting Fixtures and Equipment in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 441 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for non-electric complete lighting fixtures and equipment across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 6,500 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for non-electric complete lighting fixtures and equipment. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for non-electric complete lighting fixtures and equipment in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 38
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 52
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 53
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 54
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 56
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 57
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 58
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 59
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 60
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 62
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 65
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 66
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 71
4 GREAT LAKES 76
4.1 Executive Summary 76
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 77
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 78
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 85
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 93
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 94
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 97
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 100
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 101
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 106
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 110
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 111
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 118
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 125
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 126
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 130
5 MID-ATLANTIC 135
5.1 Executive Summary 135
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 136
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 137
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 138
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 138
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 140
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 140
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 141
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 142
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 147
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 152
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 153
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 160
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 168
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 169
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 181
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 193
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 194
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 204
6 NEW ENGLAND 214
6.1 Executive Summary 214
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 215
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 216
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 220
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 224
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 225
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 226
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 228
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 229
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 235
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 242
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 243
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 245
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 246
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 247
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 248
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 250
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 251
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 252
7 PLAINS 253
7.1 Executive Summary 253
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 254
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 255
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 257
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 259
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 260
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 262
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 264
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 265
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 269
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 273
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 274
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 277
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 281
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 282
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 283
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 284
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 285
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 286
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 287
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 288
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 289
8 ROCKIES 290
8.1 Executive Summary 290
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 291
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 292
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 294
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 297
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 298
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 299
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 300
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 301
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 302
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 303
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 304
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 306
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 308
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 309
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 310
9 SOUTHEAST 311
9.1 Executive Summary 311
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 312
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 313
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 316
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 319
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 320
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 322
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 324
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 325
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 334
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 344
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 345
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 349
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 354
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 355
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 358
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 361
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 362
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 365
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 368
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 369
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 371
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 373
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 374
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 378
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 382
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 383
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 386
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 389
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 390
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 393
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 396
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 397
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 401
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 405
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 406
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 408
10 SOUTHWEST 410
10.1 Executive Summary 410
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 411
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 412
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 413
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 415
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 416
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 417
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 418
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 419
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 421
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 423
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 424
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 432
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 440
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 440
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 441

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.