The 2016-2021 Outlook for School Single-Pupil Units Excluding Library Furniture and Furniture Made from Stone and Concrete in the United States

 Published On: Jan, 2013 |    No of Pages: 683 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for School Single-Pupil Units Excluding Library Furniture and Furniture Made from Stone and Concrete across the regions of the United States, including provinces, autonomous regions (Guangxi, Nei Mongol, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Xizang - Tibet), municipalities (Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai, and Tianjin), special administrative regions (Hong Kong and Macau), and Taiwan (all hereafter referred to as “regions”). Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 1,100 cities in the United States. For each major city in question, the percent share the city is of the region and of the United States is reported. Each major city is defined as an area of “economic population”, as opposed to the demographic population within a legal geographic boundary. For many cities, the economic population is much larger that the population within the city limits; this is especially true for the cities of the Western regions. For the coastal regions, cities which are close to other major cities or which represent, by themselves, a high percent of the regional population, actual city-level population is closer to the economic population (e.g. in Beijing). Based on this “economic” definition of population, comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city’s marketing and distribution value vis-ŕ-vis others. This exercise is quite useful for persons setting up distribution centers or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each region and city of influence, latent demand estimates are created for School Single-Pupil Units Excluding Library Furniture and Furniture Made from Stone and Concrete. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved.

1 INTRODUCTION (FREE TO VIEW) 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 44
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 63
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 64
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 66
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 69
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 70
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 71
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 73
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 74
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 78
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 82
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 83
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 91
4 GREAT LAKES 99
4.1 Executive Summary 99
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 100
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 101
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 113
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 125
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 126
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 133
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 139
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 140
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 149
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 157
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 158
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 171
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 184
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 185
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 194
5 MID-ATLANTIC 203
5.1 Executive Summary 203
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 204
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 205
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 206
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 207
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 209
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 209
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 210
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 211
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 217
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 224
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 225
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 235
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 245
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 246
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 268
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 290
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 291
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 308
6 NEW ENGLAND 325
6.1 Executive Summary 325
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 326
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 327
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 332
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 337
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 338
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 342
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 347
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 348
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 356
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 365
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 366
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 369
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 373
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 374
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 375
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 377
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 378
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 380
7 PLAINS 383
7.1 Executive Summary 383
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 384
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 385
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 390
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 395
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 396
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 399
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 402
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 403
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 409
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 415
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 416
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 422
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 429
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 430
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 432
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 434
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 435
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 436
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 437
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 438
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 439
8 ROCKIES 441
8.1 Executive Summary 441
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 442
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 443
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 447
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 451
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 452
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 454
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 456
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 457
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 459
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 461
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 462
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 465
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 468
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 469
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 470
9 SOUTHEAST 472
9.1 Executive Summary 472
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 473
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 474
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 479
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 485
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 486
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 490
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 494
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 495
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 511
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 527
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 528
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 535
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 542
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 543
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 548
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 552
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 553
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 558
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 563
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 564
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 567
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 571
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 572
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 580
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 588
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 589
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 594
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 599
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 600
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 605
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 611
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 612
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 617
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 622
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 623
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 625
10 SOUTHWEST 628
10.1 Executive Summary 628
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 629
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 630
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 633
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 636
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 637
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 639
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 641
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 642
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 646
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 650
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 651
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 666
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 682
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 682
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 683

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.