The 2016-2021 Outlook for Unpainted and Finished Ready-To-Assemble Wood Home Entertainment Centers Sold in Kits Excluding Custom Furniture Sold at Retail Directly to the Customer in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 757 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood home entertainment centers sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood home entertainment centers sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood home entertainment centers sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 27
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 69
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 70
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 73
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 76
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 77
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 79
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 81
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 82
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 86
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 91
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 92
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 100
4 GREAT LAKES 108
4.1 Executive Summary 108
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 110
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 111
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 126
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 140
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 141
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 148
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 155
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 156
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 165
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 175
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 176
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 190
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 204
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 205
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 215
5 MID-ATLANTIC 226
5.1 Executive Summary 226
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 228
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 229
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 230
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 231
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 233
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 233
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 234
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 235
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 242
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 249
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 250
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 260
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 270
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 271
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 297
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 323
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 324
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 341
6 NEW ENGLAND 359
6.1 Executive Summary 359
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 361
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 362
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 367
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 372
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 373
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 379
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 385
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 386
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 395
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 404
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 405
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 409
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 414
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 415
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 417
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 418
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 419
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 422
7 PLAINS 425
7.1 Executive Summary 425
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 427
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 428
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 433
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 439
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 440
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 444
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 448
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 449
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 456
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 464
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 465
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 472
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 479
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 480
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 482
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 485
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 486
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 487
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 488
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 489
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 490
8 ROCKIES 492
8.1 Executive Summary 492
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 494
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 495
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 500
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 504
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 505
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 507
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 509
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 510
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 512
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 514
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 515
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 519
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 523
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 524
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 525
9 SOUTHEAST 527
9.1 Executive Summary 527
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 529
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 530
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 536
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 542
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 543
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 547
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 551
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 552
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 568
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 585
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 586
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 593
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 601
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 602
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 607
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 612
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 613
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 618
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 623
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 624
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 627
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 631
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 632
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 640
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 648
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 649
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 654
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 659
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 660
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 666
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 672
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 673
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 678
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 684
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 685
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 687
10 SOUTHWEST 690
10.1 Executive Summary 690
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 692
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 693
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 697
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 701
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 702
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 704
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 707
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 708
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 712
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 717
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 718
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 737
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 756
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 756
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 757

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.