The 2016-2021 Outlook for Unpainted and Finished Ready-To-Assemble Wood Home Office Computer Furniture Sold in Kits Excluding Custom Furniture Sold at Retail Directly to the Customer in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 758 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood home office computer furniture sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood home office computer furniture sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood home office computer furniture sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 27
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 69
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 70
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 73
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 76
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 77
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 79
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 81
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 82
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 86
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 91
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 92
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 100
4 GREAT LAKES 108
4.1 Executive Summary 108
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 110
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 111
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 126
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 140
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 141
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 148
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 155
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 156
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 165
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 175
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 176
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 190
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 204
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 205
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 215
5 MID-ATLANTIC 226
5.1 Executive Summary 226
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 228
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 229
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 230
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 231
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 233
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 233
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 234
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 235
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 242
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 249
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 250
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 260
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 270
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 271
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 297
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 323
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 324
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 341
6 NEW ENGLAND 359
6.1 Executive Summary 359
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 361
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 362
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 367
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 373
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 374
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 380
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 386
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 387
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 396
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 405
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 406
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 410
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 415
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 416
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 418
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 419
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 420
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 423
7 PLAINS 426
7.1 Executive Summary 426
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 428
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 429
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 434
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 440
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 441
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 445
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 449
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 450
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 457
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 465
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 466
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 473
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 480
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 481
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 483
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 486
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 487
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 488
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 489
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 490
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 491
8 ROCKIES 493
8.1 Executive Summary 493
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 495
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 496
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 501
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 505
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 506
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 508
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 510
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 511
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 513
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 515
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 516
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 520
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 524
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 525
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 526
9 SOUTHEAST 528
9.1 Executive Summary 528
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 530
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 531
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 537
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 543
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 544
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 548
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 552
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 553
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 569
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 586
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 587
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 594
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 602
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 603
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 608
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 613
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 614
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 619
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 624
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 625
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 628
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 632
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 633
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 641
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 649
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 650
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 655
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 660
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 661
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 667
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 673
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 674
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 679
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 685
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 686
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 688
10 SOUTHWEST 691
10.1 Executive Summary 691
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 693
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 694
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 698
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 702
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 703
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 705
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 708
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 709
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 713
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 718
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 719
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 738
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 757
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 757
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 758

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.