The 2016-2021 Outlook for Unpainted and Finished Ready-To-Assemble Wood Shelving Sold in Kits Excluding Custom Furniture Sold at Retail Directly to the Customer in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 740 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood shelving sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood shelving sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for unpainted and finished ready-to-assemble wood shelving sold in kits excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 46
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 74
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 75
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 77
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 78
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 79
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 83
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 88
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 89
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 97
4 GREAT LAKES 105
4.1 Executive Summary 105
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 106
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 107
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 121
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 136
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 137
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 144
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 151
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 152
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 161
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 171
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 172
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 186
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 200
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 201
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 211
5 MID-ATLANTIC 222
5.1 Executive Summary 222
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 223
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 224
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 225
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 226
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 228
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 228
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 229
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 230
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 237
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 244
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 245
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 255
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 265
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 266
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 292
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 318
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 319
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 336
6 NEW ENGLAND 353
6.1 Executive Summary 353
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 354
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 355
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 360
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 365
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 366
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 372
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 378
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 379
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 388
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 397
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 398
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 402
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 407
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 408
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 409
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 411
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 412
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 415
7 PLAINS 418
7.1 Executive Summary 418
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 419
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 420
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 425
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 431
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 432
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 436
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 440
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 441
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 448
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 456
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 457
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 464
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 471
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 472
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 474
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 477
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 478
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 479
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 480
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 481
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 482
8 ROCKIES 484
8.1 Executive Summary 484
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 485
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 486
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 490
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 495
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 496
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 498
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 500
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 501
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 503
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 505
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 506
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 510
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 514
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 515
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 516
9 SOUTHEAST 518
9.1 Executive Summary 518
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 519
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 520
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 526
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 531
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 532
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 536
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 540
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 541
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 557
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 574
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 575
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 582
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 589
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 590
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 595
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 599
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 600
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 605
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 610
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 611
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 614
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 618
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 619
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 627
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 635
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 636
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 641
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 646
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 647
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 653
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 658
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 659
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 664
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 669
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 670
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 672
10 SOUTHWEST 675
10.1 Executive Summary 675
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 676
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 677
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 681
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 685
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 686
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 688
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 691
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 692
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 696
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 700
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 701
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 720
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 739
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 739
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 740

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.