The 2016-2021 Outlook for Upholstered Household Furniture Excluding Wood Furniture in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 739 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for upholstered household furniture excluding wood furniture across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for upholstered household furniture excluding wood furniture. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for upholstered household furniture excluding wood furniture in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 46
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 73
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 74
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 76
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 77
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 78
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 82
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 87
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 88
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 96
4 GREAT LAKES 104
4.1 Executive Summary 104
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 105
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 106
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 120
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 135
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 136
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 143
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 150
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 151
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 160
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 170
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 171
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 185
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 199
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 200
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 210
5 MID-ATLANTIC 221
5.1 Executive Summary 221
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 222
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 223
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 224
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 225
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 227
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 227
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 228
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 229
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 236
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 243
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 244
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 254
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 264
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 265
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 291
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 317
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 318
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 335
6 NEW ENGLAND 352
6.1 Executive Summary 352
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 353
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 354
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 359
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 364
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 365
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 371
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 377
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 378
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 387
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 396
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 397
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 401
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 406
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 407
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 408
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 410
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 411
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 414
7 PLAINS 417
7.1 Executive Summary 417
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 418
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 419
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 424
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 430
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 431
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 435
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 439
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 440
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 447
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 455
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 456
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 463
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 470
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 471
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 473
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 476
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 477
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 478
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 479
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 480
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 481
8 ROCKIES 483
8.1 Executive Summary 483
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 484
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 485
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 489
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 494
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 495
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 497
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 499
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 500
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 502
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 504
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 505
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 509
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 513
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 514
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 515
9 SOUTHEAST 517
9.1 Executive Summary 517
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 518
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 519
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 525
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 530
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 531
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 535
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 539
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 540
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 556
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 573
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 573
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 581
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 588
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 589
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 594
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 598
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 599
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 604
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 609
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 610
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 613
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 617
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 618
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 626
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 634
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 635
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 640
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 645
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 646
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 652
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 657
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 658
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 663
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 668
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 669
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 671
10 SOUTHWEST 674
10.1 Executive Summary 674
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 675
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 676
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 680
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 684
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 685
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 687
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 690
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 691
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 695
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 699
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 700
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 719
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 738
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 738
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 739

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.