The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wirebound Wood Boxes Made from Veneer and Plywood Excluding Boxes for Fruits and Vegetables in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 364 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wirebound wood boxes made from veneer and plywood excluding boxes for fruits and vegetables across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 3,800 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wirebound wood boxes made from veneer and plywood excluding boxes for fruits and vegetables. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wirebound wood boxes made from veneer and plywood excluding boxes for fruits and vegetables in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 35
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 45
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 46
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 48
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 49
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 50
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 52
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 53
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 54
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 57
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 59
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 60
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 64
4 GREAT LAKES 67
4.1 Executive Summary 67
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 69
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 70
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 76
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 81
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 82
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 85
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 87
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 88
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 92
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 95
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 96
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 101
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 105
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 106
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 109
5 MID-ATLANTIC 111
5.1 Executive Summary 111
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 113
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 114
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 116
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 117
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 118
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 118
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 119
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 120
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 124
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 127
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 128
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 134
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 139
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 140
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 146
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 151
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 152
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 157
6 NEW ENGLAND 161
6.1 Executive Summary 161
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 163
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 164
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 168
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 171
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 172
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 174
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 175
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 176
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 181
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 185
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 186
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 188
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 189
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 190
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 192
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 193
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 194
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 195
7 PLAINS 196
7.1 Executive Summary 196
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 198
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 199
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 201
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 202
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 203
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 205
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 206
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 207
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 211
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 214
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 215
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 218
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 220
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 221
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 223
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 224
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 225
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 226
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 227
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 228
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 230
8 ROCKIES 231
8.1 Executive Summary 231
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 233
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 234
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 237
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 239
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 240
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 242
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 243
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 244
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 245
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 246
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 247
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 250
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 252
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 253
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 255
9 SOUTHEAST 256
9.1 Executive Summary 256
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 258
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 259
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 262
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 264
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 265
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 267
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 268
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 269
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 276
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 282
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 283
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 287
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 290
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 291
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 293
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 294
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 295
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 298
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 300
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 301
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 303
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 304
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 305
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 309
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 312
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 313
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 316
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 318
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 319
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 322
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 324
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 325
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 329
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 332
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 333
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 335
10 SOUTHWEST 336
10.1 Executive Summary 336
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 337
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 338
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 340
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 341
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 342
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 344
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 345
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 346
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 348
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 349
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 350
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 357
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 363
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 363
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 364

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.