The 2016-2021 Outlook for Fabricated Parachutes in the United States

 Published On: Aug, 2015 |    No of Pages: 636 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for fabricated parachutes across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 9,800 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for fabricated parachutes. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for fabricated parachutes in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 44
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 62
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 63
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 66
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 68
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 69
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 71
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 72
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 73
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 77
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 80
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 81
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 88
4 GREAT LAKES 94
4.1 Executive Summary 94
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 95
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 96
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 108
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 119
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 120
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 126
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 131
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 132
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 140
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 147
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 148
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 159
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 169
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 170
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 177
5 MID-ATLANTIC 183
5.1 Executive Summary 183
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 184
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 185
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 187
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 188
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 189
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 189
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 190
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 191
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 198
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 204
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 205
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 215
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 224
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 225
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 242
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 258
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 259
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 275
6 NEW ENGLAND 290
6.1 Executive Summary 290
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 291
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 292
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 297
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 301
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 302
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 305
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 307
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 308
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 316
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 323
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 324
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 328
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 331
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 332
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 334
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 335
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 336
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 338
7 PLAINS 339
7.1 Executive Summary 339
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 341
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 342
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 347
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 351
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 352
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 356
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 359
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 360
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 367
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 373
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 374
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 381
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 387
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 388
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 391
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 393
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 394
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 396
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 397
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 398
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 400
8 ROCKIES 401
8.1 Executive Summary 401
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 402
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 403
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 408
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 412
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 413
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 416
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 418
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 419
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 421
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 422
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 423
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 427
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 430
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 431
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 433
9 SOUTHEAST 434
9.1 Executive Summary 434
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 436
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 437
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 442
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 446
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 447
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 451
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 454
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 455
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 469
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 482
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 483
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 491
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 498
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 499
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 504
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 508
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 509
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 514
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 518
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 519
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 523
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 526
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 527
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 535
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 542
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 543
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 548
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 552
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 553
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 559
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 564
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 565
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 571
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 576
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 577
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 580
10 SOUTHWEST 582
10.1 Executive Summary 582
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 583
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 584
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 588
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 591
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 592
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 595
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 597
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 598
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 602
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 605
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 606
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 621
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 635
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 635
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 636

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.