The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's and Girls' Leather Belts Made for Sale Separately in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 782 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's and girls' leather belts made for sale separately across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's and girls' leather belts made for sale separately. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's and girls' leather belts made for sale separately in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 50
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 71
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 72
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 76
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 79
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 80
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 83
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 85
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 86
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 91
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 95
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 96
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 105
4 GREAT LAKES 113
4.1 Executive Summary 113
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 114
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 115
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 130
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 144
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 145
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 153
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 160
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 161
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 171
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 180
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 181
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 195
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 209
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 210
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 221
5 MID-ATLANTIC 231
5.1 Executive Summary 231
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 233
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 234
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 236
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 237
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 238
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 238
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 239
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 240
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 248
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 255
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 256
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 267
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 277
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 278
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 304
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 329
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 330
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 348
6 NEW ENGLAND 365
6.1 Executive Summary 365
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 367
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 368
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 374
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 379
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 380
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 387
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 393
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 394
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 404
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 413
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 414
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 419
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 423
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 424
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 427
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 429
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 430
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 434
7 PLAINS 437
7.1 Executive Summary 437
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 439
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 440
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 446
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 451
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 452
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 457
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 461
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 462
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 470
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 477
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 478
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 486
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 493
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 494
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 497
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 499
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 500
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 502
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 503
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 504
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 506
8 ROCKIES 507
8.1 Executive Summary 507
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 508
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 509
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 515
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 520
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 521
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 524
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 526
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 527
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 530
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 532
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 533
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 538
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 542
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 543
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 545
9 SOUTHEAST 546
9.1 Executive Summary 546
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 548
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 549
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 556
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 562
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 563
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 568
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 572
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 573
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 590
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 606
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 607
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 615
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 622
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 623
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 629
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 634
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 635
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 641
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 646
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 647
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 651
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 654
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 655
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 664
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 672
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 673
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 679
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 684
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 685
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 692
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 698
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 699
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 705
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 710
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 711
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 714
10 SOUTHWEST 716
10.1 Executive Summary 716
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 717
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 718
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 723
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 727
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 728
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 731
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 733
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 734
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 739
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 743
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 744
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 763
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 781
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 781
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 782

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.