The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's and Girls' Tailored Suits, Pantsuits, and Dress Uniforms in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 709 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's and girls' tailored suits, pantsuits, and dress uniforms across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,200 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's and girls' tailored suits, pantsuits, and dress uniforms. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's and girls' tailored suits, pantsuits, and dress uniforms in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 73
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 74
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 77
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 79
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 80
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 85
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 89
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 90
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 98
4 GREAT LAKES 105
4.1 Executive Summary 105
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 106
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 107
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 120
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 132
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 133
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 140
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 146
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 147
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 156
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 164
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 165
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 178
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 190
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 191
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 200
5 MID-ATLANTIC 208
5.1 Executive Summary 208
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 210
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 211
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 213
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 214
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 215
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 215
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 216
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 217
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 224
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 230
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 231
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 242
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 252
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 253
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 273
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 292
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 293
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 310
6 NEW ENGLAND 326
6.1 Executive Summary 326
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 328
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 329
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 335
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 340
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 341
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 346
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 350
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 351
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 360
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 368
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 369
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 373
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 376
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 377
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 379
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 380
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 381
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 384
7 PLAINS 386
7.1 Executive Summary 386
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 388
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 389
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 395
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 400
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 401
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 405
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 408
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 409
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 417
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 424
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 425
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 432
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 438
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 439
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 442
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 444
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 445
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 447
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 448
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 449
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 451
8 ROCKIES 452
8.1 Executive Summary 452
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 453
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 454
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 459
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 463
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 464
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 467
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 469
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 470
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 473
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 475
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 476
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 480
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 483
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 484
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 486
9 SOUTHEAST 487
9.1 Executive Summary 487
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 489
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 490
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 496
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 501
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 502
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 507
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 511
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 512
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 528
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 543
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 544
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 552
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 559
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 560
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 565
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 569
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 570
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 576
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 581
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 582
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 586
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 589
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 590
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 599
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 607
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 608
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 614
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 619
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 620
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 626
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 631
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 632
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 638
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 643
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 644
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 647
10 SOUTHWEST 649
10.1 Executive Summary 649
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 650
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 651
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 655
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 658
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 659
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 662
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 664
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 665
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 670
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 674
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 675
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 692
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 708
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 708
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 709

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.