The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's and Misses' Finished Anklets, Slack Socks, Crew Socks, and Athletic Socks Made from Manmade Fibers Excluding Sheer Hosiery in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 651 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's and misses' finished anklets, slack socks, crew socks, and athletic socks made from manmade fibers excluding sheer hosiery across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 10,000 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's and misses' finished anklets, slack socks, crew socks, and athletic socks made from manmade fibers excluding sheer hosiery. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's and misses' finished anklets, slack socks, crew socks, and athletic socks made from manmade fibers excluding sheer hosiery in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 45
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 63
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 64
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 67
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 69
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 70
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 72
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 73
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 74
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 78
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 81
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 82
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 90
4 GREAT LAKES 97
4.1 Executive Summary 97
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 98
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 99
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 111
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 122
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 123
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 129
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 134
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 135
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 143
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 150
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 151
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 162
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 172
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 173
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 180
5 MID-ATLANTIC 186
5.1 Executive Summary 186
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 188
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 189
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 191
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 192
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 193
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 193
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 194
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 195
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 202
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 208
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 209
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 219
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 228
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 229
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 246
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 262
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 263
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 279
6 NEW ENGLAND 294
6.1 Executive Summary 294
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 296
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 297
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 303
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 308
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 309
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 313
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 316
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 317
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 325
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 332
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 333
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 337
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 340
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 341
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 343
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 344
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 345
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 347
7 PLAINS 348
7.1 Executive Summary 348
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 350
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 351
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 356
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 360
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 361
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 365
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 368
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 369
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 376
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 382
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 383
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 390
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 396
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 397
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 400
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 402
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 403
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 405
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 406
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 407
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 409
8 ROCKIES 410
8.1 Executive Summary 410
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 411
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 412
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 417
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 421
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 422
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 425
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 427
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 428
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 430
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 431
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 432
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 436
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 439
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 440
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 442
9 SOUTHEAST 443
9.1 Executive Summary 443
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 445
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 446
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 451
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 455
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 456
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 460
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 463
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 464
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 479
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 493
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 494
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 502
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 509
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 510
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 515
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 519
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 520
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 526
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 531
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 532
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 536
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 539
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 540
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 548
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 555
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 556
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 562
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 567
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 568
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 574
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 579
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 580
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 586
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 591
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 592
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 595
10 SOUTHWEST 597
10.1 Executive Summary 597
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 598
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 599
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 603
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 606
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 607
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 610
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 612
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 613
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 617
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 620
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 621
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 636
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 650
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 650
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 651

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.