The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's and Misses' Knee Highs Made from Manmade Fibers in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 249 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's and misses' knee highs made from manmade fibers across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 1,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's and misses' knee highs made from manmade fibers. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's and misses' knee highs made from manmade fibers in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 31
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 37
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 38
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 39
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 40
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 41
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 43
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 44
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 45
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 47
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 48
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 49
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 52
4 GREAT LAKES 54
4.1 Executive Summary 54
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 55
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 56
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 59
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 61
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 62
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 64
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 65
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 66
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 69
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 71
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 72
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 75
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 77
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 78
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 80
5 MID-ATLANTIC 81
5.1 Executive Summary 81
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 83
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 84
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 85
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 86
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 87
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 87
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 88
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 89
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 92
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 94
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 95
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 98
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 100
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 101
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 104
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 106
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 107
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 109
6 NEW ENGLAND 110
6.1 Executive Summary 110
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 112
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 113
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 115
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 116
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 117
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 117
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 118
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 119
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 122
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 124
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 125
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 125
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 126
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 127
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 128
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 129
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 130
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 130
7 PLAINS 131
7.1 Executive Summary 131
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 133
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 134
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 136
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 137
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 138
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 140
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 141
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 142
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 144
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 145
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 146
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 148
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 149
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 150
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 151
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 152
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 153
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 153
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 154
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 155
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 155
8 ROCKIES 156
8.1 Executive Summary 156
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 157
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 158
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 160
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 161
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 162
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 163
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 164
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 165
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 165
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 166
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 167
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 169
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 170
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 171
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 171
9 SOUTHEAST 172
9.1 Executive Summary 172
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 174
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 175
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 177
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 178
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 179
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 181
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 182
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 183
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 187
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 190
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 191
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 194
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 196
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 197
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 199
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 200
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 201
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 203
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 204
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 205
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 206
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 207
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 208
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 210
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 211
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 212
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 214
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 215
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 216
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 218
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 219
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 220
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 223
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 225
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 226
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 227
10 SOUTHWEST 228
10.1 Executive Summary 228
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 229
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 230
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 232
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 233
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 234
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 235
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 236
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 237
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 239
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 240
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 241
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 245
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 248
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 248
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 249

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.