The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Girls', and Infants' Knit Underwear and Nightwear Made in Knitting Mills in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 783 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, girls', and infants' knit underwear and nightwear made in knitting mills across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, girls', and infants' knit underwear and nightwear made in knitting mills. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, girls', and infants' knit underwear and nightwear made in knitting mills in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 50
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 71
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 72
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 76
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 79
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 80
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 83
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 85
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 86
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 91
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 95
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 96
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 105
4 GREAT LAKES 113
4.1 Executive Summary 113
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 114
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 115
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 130
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 144
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 145
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 153
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 160
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 161
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 171
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 180
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 181
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 196
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 210
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 211
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 222
5 MID-ATLANTIC 232
5.1 Executive Summary 232
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 234
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 235
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 237
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 238
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 239
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 239
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 240
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 241
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 249
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 256
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 257
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 268
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 278
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 279
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 305
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 330
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 331
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 349
6 NEW ENGLAND 366
6.1 Executive Summary 366
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 368
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 369
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 375
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 380
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 381
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 388
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 394
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 395
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 405
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 414
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 415
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 420
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 424
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 425
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 428
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 430
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 431
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 435
7 PLAINS 438
7.1 Executive Summary 438
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 440
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 441
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 447
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 452
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 453
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 458
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 462
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 463
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 471
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 478
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 479
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 487
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 494
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 495
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 498
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 500
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 501
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 503
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 504
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 505
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 507
8 ROCKIES 508
8.1 Executive Summary 508
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 509
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 510
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 516
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 521
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 522
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 525
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 527
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 528
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 531
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 533
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 534
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 539
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 543
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 544
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 546
9 SOUTHEAST 547
9.1 Executive Summary 547
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 549
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 550
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 557
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 563
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 564
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 569
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 573
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 574
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 591
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 607
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 608
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 616
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 623
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 624
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 630
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 635
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 636
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 642
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 647
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 648
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 652
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 655
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 656
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 665
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 673
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 674
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 680
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 685
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 686
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 693
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 699
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 700
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 706
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 711
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 712
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 715
10 SOUTHWEST 717
10.1 Executive Summary 717
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 718
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 719
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 724
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 728
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 729
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 732
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 734
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 735
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 740
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 744
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 745
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 764
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 782
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 782
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 783

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.