The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Girls', and Infants' Leather and Sheep-Lined Clothing in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 583 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, girls', and infants' leather and sheep-lined clothing across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 8,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of it’s state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, girls', and infants' leather and sheep-lined clothing. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, girls', and infants' leather and sheep-lined clothing in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 43
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 59
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 60
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 63
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 65
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 66
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 68
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 69
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 70
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 74
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 77
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 78
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 85
4 GREAT LAKES 91
4.1 Executive Summary 91
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 92
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 93
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 104
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 114
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 115
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 120
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 124
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 125
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 132
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 138
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 139
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 149
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 158
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 159
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 165
5 MID-ATLANTIC 170
5.1 Executive Summary 170
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 172
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 173
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 175
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 176
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 177
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 177
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 178
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 179
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 185
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 190
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 191
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 200
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 208
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 209
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 224
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 238
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 239
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 253
6 NEW ENGLAND 266
6.1 Executive Summary 266
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 268
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 269
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 274
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 278
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 279
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 282
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 284
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 285
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 292
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 298
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 299
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 302
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 304
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 305
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 307
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 308
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 309
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 311
7 PLAINS 312
7.1 Executive Summary 312
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 314
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 315
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 319
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 322
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 323
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 326
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 328
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 329
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 335
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 340
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 341
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 347
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 352
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 353
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 356
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 358
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 359
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 361
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 362
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 363
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 365
8 ROCKIES 366
8.1 Executive Summary 366
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 367
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 368
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 372
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 375
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 376
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 378
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 379
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 380
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 382
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 383
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 384
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 388
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 391
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 392
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 394
9 SOUTHEAST 395
9.1 Executive Summary 395
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 397
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 398
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 403
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 407
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 408
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 412
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 415
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 416
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 429
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 441
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 442
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 449
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 455
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 456
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 460
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 463
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 464
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 469
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 473
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 474
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 478
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 481
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 482
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 489
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 495
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 496
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 501
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 505
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 506
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 511
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 515
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 516
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 522
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 527
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 528
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 531
10 SOUTHWEST 533
10.1 Executive Summary 533
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 534
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 535
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 539
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 542
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 543
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 546
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 548
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 549
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 553
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 556
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 557
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 570
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 582
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 582
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 583

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.