The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Misses', and Girls' Full-Length Sheer Finished Hosiery in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 557 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, misses', and girls' full-length sheer finished hosiery across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,900 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, misses', and girls' full-length sheer finished hosiery. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, misses', and girls' full-length sheer finished hosiery in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 43
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 59
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 60
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 63
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 65
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 66
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 68
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 69
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 70
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 74
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 77
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 78
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 84
4 GREAT LAKES 89
4.1 Executive Summary 89
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 90
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 91
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 101
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 110
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 111
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 116
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 120
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 121
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 128
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 134
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 135
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 144
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 152
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 153
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 159
5 MID-ATLANTIC 164
5.1 Executive Summary 164
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 166
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 167
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 169
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 170
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 171
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 171
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 172
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 173
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 179
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 184
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 185
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 194
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 202
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 203
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 216
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 228
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 229
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 242
6 NEW ENGLAND 254
6.1 Executive Summary 254
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 256
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 257
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 262
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 266
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 267
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 270
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 272
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 273
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 280
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 286
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 287
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 290
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 292
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 293
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 295
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 296
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 297
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 299
7 PLAINS 300
7.1 Executive Summary 300
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 302
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 303
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 307
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 310
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 311
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 314
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 316
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 317
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 322
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 326
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 327
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 333
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 338
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 339
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 342
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 344
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 345
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 347
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 348
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 349
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 351
8 ROCKIES 352
8.1 Executive Summary 352
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 353
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 354
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 358
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 361
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 362
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 364
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 365
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 366
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 368
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 369
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 370
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 374
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 377
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 378
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 380
9 SOUTHEAST 381
9.1 Executive Summary 381
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 383
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 384
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 389
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 393
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 394
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 397
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 399
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 400
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 413
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 425
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 426
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 433
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 439
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 440
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 444
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 447
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 448
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 453
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 457
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 458
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 461
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 463
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 464
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 471
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 477
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 478
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 483
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 487
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 488
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 493
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 497
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 498
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 503
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 507
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 508
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 511
10 SOUTHWEST 513
10.1 Executive Summary 513
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 514
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 515
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 518
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 520
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 521
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 524
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 526
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 527
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 530
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 532
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 533
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 545
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 556
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 556
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 557

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.