The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Misses', and Girls' Opaque Stretch Sheer Finished Pantyhose and Tights of at Least 30 Denier in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 733 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, misses', and girls' opaque stretch sheer finished pantyhose and tights of at least 30 denier across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 11,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, misses', and girls' opaque stretch sheer finished pantyhose and tights of at least 30 denier. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, misses', and girls' opaque stretch sheer finished pantyhose and tights of at least 30 denier in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 73
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 74
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 77
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 79
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 80
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 85
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 89
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 90
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 99
4 GREAT LAKES 107
4.1 Executive Summary 107
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 109
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 110
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 124
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 137
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 138
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 145
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 151
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 152
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 161
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 169
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 170
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 183
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 195
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 196
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 205
5 MID-ATLANTIC 213
5.1 Executive Summary 213
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 215
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 216
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 218
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 219
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 220
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 220
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 221
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 222
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 230
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 237
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 238
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 249
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 259
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 260
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 282
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 303
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 304
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 322
6 NEW ENGLAND 339
6.1 Executive Summary 339
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 341
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 342
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 348
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 353
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 354
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 359
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 363
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 364
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 373
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 381
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 382
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 386
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 389
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 390
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 392
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 393
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 394
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 397
7 PLAINS 399
7.1 Executive Summary 399
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 401
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 402
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 408
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 413
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 414
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 419
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 423
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 424
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 432
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 439
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 440
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 448
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 455
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 456
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 459
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 461
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 462
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 464
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 465
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 466
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 468
8 ROCKIES 469
8.1 Executive Summary 469
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 471
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 472
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 477
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 481
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 482
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 485
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 487
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 488
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 491
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 493
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 494
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 498
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 501
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 502
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 504
9 SOUTHEAST 505
9.1 Executive Summary 505
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 507
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 508
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 514
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 519
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 520
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 525
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 529
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 530
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 546
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 561
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 562
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 570
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 577
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 578
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 583
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 587
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 588
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 594
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 599
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 600
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 604
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 607
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 608
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 617
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 625
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 626
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 632
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 637
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 638
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 645
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 651
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 652
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 658
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 663
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 664
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 667
10 SOUTHWEST 669
10.1 Executive Summary 669
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 670
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 671
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 676
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 680
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 681
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 684
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 686
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 687
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 692
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 696
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 697
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 715
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 732
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 732
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 733

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.