The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Misses', and Girls' Sheer Finished Elastomer Leg Support Pantyhose and Tights under 35 Denier in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 534 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer leg support pantyhose and tights under 35 denier across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 7,500 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer leg support pantyhose and tights under 35 denier. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer leg support pantyhose and tights under 35 denier in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 42
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 57
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 58
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 61
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 63
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 64
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 66
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 67
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 68
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 72
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 75
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 76
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 82
4 GREAT LAKES 87
4.1 Executive Summary 87
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 89
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 90
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 100
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 109
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 110
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 115
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 119
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 120
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 126
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 131
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 132
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 141
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 149
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 150
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 155
5 MID-ATLANTIC 159
5.1 Executive Summary 159
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 161
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 162
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 164
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 165
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 166
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 166
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 167
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 168
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 174
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 179
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 180
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 189
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 197
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 198
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 211
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 223
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 224
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 236
6 NEW ENGLAND 247
6.1 Executive Summary 247
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 249
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 250
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 255
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 259
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 260
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 263
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 265
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 266
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 273
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 279
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 280
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 283
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 285
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 286
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 288
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 289
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 290
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 292
7 PLAINS 293
7.1 Executive Summary 293
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 295
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 296
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 300
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 303
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 304
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 307
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 309
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 310
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 315
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 319
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 320
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 325
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 329
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 330
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 332
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 333
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 334
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 336
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 337
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 338
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 340
8 ROCKIES 341
8.1 Executive Summary 341
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 343
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 344
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 348
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 351
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 352
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 354
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 355
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 356
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 358
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 359
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 360
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 363
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 365
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 366
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 368
9 SOUTHEAST 369
9.1 Executive Summary 369
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 371
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 372
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 376
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 379
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 380
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 383
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 385
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 386
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 398
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 409
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 410
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 417
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 423
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 424
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 428
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 431
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 432
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 437
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 441
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 442
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 445
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 447
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 448
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 454
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 459
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 460
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 464
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 467
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 468
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 473
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 477
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 478
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 483
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 487
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 488
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 491
10 SOUTHWEST 493
10.1 Executive Summary 493
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 494
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 495
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 498
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 500
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 501
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 503
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 504
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 505
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 508
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 510
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 511
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 522
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 533
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 533
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 534

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.