The 2016-2021 Outlook for Women's, Misses', and Girls' Sheer Finished Elastomer Leg Support Pantyhose and Tights in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 641 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer leg support pantyhose and tights across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 9,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer leg support pantyhose and tights. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for women's, misses', and girls' sheer finished elastomer leg support pantyhose and tights in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 45
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 63
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 64
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 67
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 69
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 70
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 72
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 73
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 74
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 78
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 81
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 82
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 89
4 GREAT LAKES 95
4.1 Executive Summary 95
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 96
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 97
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 109
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 120
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 121
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 127
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 132
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 133
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 141
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 148
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 149
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 160
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 170
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 171
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 178
5 MID-ATLANTIC 184
5.1 Executive Summary 184
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 186
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 187
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 189
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 190
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 191
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 191
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 192
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 193
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 200
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 206
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 207
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 217
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 226
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 227
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 244
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 260
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 261
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 277
6 NEW ENGLAND 292
6.1 Executive Summary 292
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 294
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 295
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 301
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 306
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 307
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 310
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 312
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 313
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 321
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 328
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 329
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 333
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 336
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 337
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 339
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 340
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 341
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 343
7 PLAINS 344
7.1 Executive Summary 344
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 346
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 347
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 352
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 356
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 357
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 361
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 364
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 365
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 372
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 378
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 379
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 386
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 392
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 393
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 396
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 398
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 399
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 401
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 402
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 403
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 405
8 ROCKIES 406
8.1 Executive Summary 406
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 407
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 408
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 413
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 417
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 418
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 420
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 421
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 422
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 424
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 425
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 426
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 430
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 433
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 434
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 436
9 SOUTHEAST 437
9.1 Executive Summary 437
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 439
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 440
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 445
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 449
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 450
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 454
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 457
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 458
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 472
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 485
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 486
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 494
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 501
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 502
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 507
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 511
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 512
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 518
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 523
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 524
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 528
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 531
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 532
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 540
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 547
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 548
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 553
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 557
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 558
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 564
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 569
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 570
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 576
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 581
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 582
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 585
10 SOUTHWEST 587
10.1 Executive Summary 587
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 588
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 589
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 593
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 596
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 597
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 600
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 602
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 603
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 607
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 610
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 611
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 626
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 640
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 640
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 641

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.