The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wood and Plastics Laminated Wood Custom Bathroom Vanity Tops in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 591 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wood and plastics laminated wood custom bathroom vanity tops across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 8,800 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wood and plastics laminated wood custom bathroom vanity tops. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wood and plastics laminated wood custom bathroom vanity tops in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 43
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 59
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 60
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 63
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 65
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 66
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 68
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 69
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 70
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 74
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 77
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 78
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 85
4 GREAT LAKES 91
4.1 Executive Summary 91
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 92
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 93
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 104
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 114
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 115
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 120
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 124
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 125
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 132
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 138
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 139
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 149
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 158
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 159
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 165
5 MID-ATLANTIC 170
5.1 Executive Summary 170
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 172
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 173
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 175
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 176
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 177
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 177
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 178
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 179
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 185
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 190
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 191
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 201
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 210
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 211
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 226
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 240
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 241
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 255
6 NEW ENGLAND 268
6.1 Executive Summary 268
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 270
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 271
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 276
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 280
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 281
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 284
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 286
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 287
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 295
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 302
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 303
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 306
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 308
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 309
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 311
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 312
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 313
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 315
7 PLAINS 316
7.1 Executive Summary 316
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 318
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 319
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 323
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 326
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 327
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 330
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 332
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 333
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 339
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 344
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 345
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 351
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 356
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 357
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 360
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 362
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 363
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 365
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 366
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 367
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 369
8 ROCKIES 370
8.1 Executive Summary 370
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 371
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 372
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 376
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 379
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 380
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 382
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 383
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 384
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 386
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 387
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 388
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 392
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 395
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 396
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 398
9 SOUTHEAST 399
9.1 Executive Summary 399
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 401
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 402
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 407
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 411
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 412
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 416
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 419
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 420
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 434
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 447
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 448
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 456
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 463
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 464
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 468
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 471
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 472
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 477
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 481
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 482
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 486
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 489
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 490
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 497
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 503
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 504
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 509
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 513
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 514
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 519
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 523
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 524
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 530
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 535
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 536
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 539
10 SOUTHWEST 541
10.1 Executive Summary 541
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 542
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 543
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 547
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 550
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 551
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 554
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 556
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 557
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 561
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 564
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 565
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 578
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 590
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 590
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 591

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.