The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wood and Plastics Laminated Wood Stock-Line Bathroom Vanity Tops in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 581 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wood and plastics laminated wood stock-line bathroom vanity tops across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 8,600 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wood and plastics laminated wood stock-line bathroom vanity tops. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wood and plastics laminated wood stock-line bathroom vanity tops in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 43
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 59
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 60
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 63
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 65
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 66
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 68
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 69
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 70
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 74
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 77
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 78
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 85
4 GREAT LAKES 91
4.1 Executive Summary 91
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 92
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 93
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 104
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 114
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 115
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 120
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 124
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 125
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 132
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 138
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 139
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 149
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 158
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 159
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 165
5 MID-ATLANTIC 170
5.1 Executive Summary 170
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 172
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 173
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 175
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 176
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 177
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 177
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 178
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 179
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 185
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 190
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 191
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 200
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 208
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 209
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 223
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 236
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 237
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 251
6 NEW ENGLAND 264
6.1 Executive Summary 264
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 266
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 267
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 272
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 276
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 277
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 280
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 282
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 283
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 290
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 296
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 297
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 300
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 302
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 303
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 305
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 306
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 307
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 309
7 PLAINS 310
7.1 Executive Summary 310
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 312
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 313
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 317
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 320
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 321
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 324
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 326
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 327
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 333
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 338
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 339
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 345
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 350
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 351
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 354
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 356
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 357
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 359
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 360
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 361
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 363
8 ROCKIES 364
8.1 Executive Summary 364
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 365
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 366
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 370
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 373
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 374
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 376
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 377
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 378
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 380
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 381
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 382
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 386
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 389
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 390
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 392
9 SOUTHEAST 393
9.1 Executive Summary 393
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 395
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 396
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 401
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 405
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 406
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 410
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 413
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 414
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 427
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 439
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 440
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 447
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 453
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 454
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 458
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 461
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 462
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 467
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 471
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 472
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 476
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 479
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 480
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 487
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 493
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 494
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 499
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 503
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 504
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 509
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 513
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 514
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 520
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 525
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 526
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 529
10 SOUTHWEST 531
10.1 Executive Summary 531
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 532
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 533
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 537
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 540
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 541
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 544
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 546
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 547
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 551
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 554
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 555
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 568
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 580
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 580
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 581

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.