The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wood Arm and Side Chairs in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 730 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wood arm and side chairs across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,100 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wood arm and side chairs. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wood arm and side chairs in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 27
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 47
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 66
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 67
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 71
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 74
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 75
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 78
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 80
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 81
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 86
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 90
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 91
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 100
4 GREAT LAKES 108
4.1 Executive Summary 108
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 109
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 110
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 124
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 137
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 138
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 145
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 151
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 152
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 162
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 171
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 172
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 185
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 197
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 198
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 208
5 MID-ATLANTIC 217
5.1 Executive Summary 217
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 218
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 219
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 221
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 222
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 223
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 223
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 224
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 225
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 232
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 238
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 239
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 250
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 260
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 261
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 284
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 306
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 307
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 324
6 NEW ENGLAND 340
6.1 Executive Summary 340
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 341
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 342
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 348
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 353
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 354
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 359
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 363
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 364
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 373
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 381
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 382
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 386
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 389
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 390
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 392
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 393
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 394
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 397
7 PLAINS 399
7.1 Executive Summary 399
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 401
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 402
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 408
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 413
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 414
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 419
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 423
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 424
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 432
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 439
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 440
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 448
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 455
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 456
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 459
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 461
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 462
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 464
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 465
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 466
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 468
8 ROCKIES 469
8.1 Executive Summary 469
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 470
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 471
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 476
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 480
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 481
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 484
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 486
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 487
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 490
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 492
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 493
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 497
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 500
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 501
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 503
9 SOUTHEAST 504
9.1 Executive Summary 504
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 506
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 507
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 513
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 518
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 519
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 524
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 528
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 529
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 545
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 560
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 561
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 569
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 576
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 577
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 582
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 586
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 587
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 593
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 598
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 599
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 603
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 606
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 607
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 616
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 624
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 625
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 631
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 636
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 637
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 643
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 648
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 649
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 655
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 660
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 661
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 664
10 SOUTHWEST 666
10.1 Executive Summary 666
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 667
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 668
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 673
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 677
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 678
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 681
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 683
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 684
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 689
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 693
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 694
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 712
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 729
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 729
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 730

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.