The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wood Bedroom Armoires, Chifforobes, Wardrobes, and Wardrobe-Type Cabinets Excluding Custom Furniture Sold at Retail Directly to the Customer in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 784 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wood bedroom armoires, chifforobes, wardrobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wood bedroom armoires, chifforobes, wardrobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wood bedroom armoires, chifforobes, wardrobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 50
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 71
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 72
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 76
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 79
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 80
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 83
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 85
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 86
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 91
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 95
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 96
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 105
4 GREAT LAKES 113
4.1 Executive Summary 113
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 115
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 116
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 131
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 145
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 146
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 154
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 161
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 162
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 172
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 181
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 182
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 197
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 211
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 212
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 223
5 MID-ATLANTIC 233
5.1 Executive Summary 233
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 235
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 236
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 238
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 239
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 240
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 240
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 241
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 242
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 250
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 257
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 258
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 269
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 279
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 280
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 306
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 331
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 332
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 350
6 NEW ENGLAND 367
6.1 Executive Summary 367
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 369
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 370
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 376
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 381
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 382
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 389
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 395
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 396
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 406
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 415
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 416
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 421
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 425
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 426
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 429
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 431
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 432
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 436
7 PLAINS 439
7.1 Executive Summary 439
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 441
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 442
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 448
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 453
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 454
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 459
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 463
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 464
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 472
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 479
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 480
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 488
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 495
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 496
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 499
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 501
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 502
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 504
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 505
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 506
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 508
8 ROCKIES 509
8.1 Executive Summary 509
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 510
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 511
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 517
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 522
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 523
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 526
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 528
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 529
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 532
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 534
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 535
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 540
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 544
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 545
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 547
9 SOUTHEAST 548
9.1 Executive Summary 548
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 550
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 551
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 558
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 564
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 565
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 570
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 574
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 575
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 592
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 608
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 609
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 617
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 624
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 625
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 631
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 636
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 637
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 643
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 648
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 649
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 653
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 656
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 657
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 666
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 674
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 675
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 681
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 686
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 687
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 694
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 700
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 701
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 707
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 712
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 713
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 716
10 SOUTHWEST 718
10.1 Executive Summary 718
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 719
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 720
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 725
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 729
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 730
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 733
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 735
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 736
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 741
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 745
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 746
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 765
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 783
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 783
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 784

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.