The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wood Bedroom Cedar Chests Excluding Custom Furniture Sold at Retail Directly to the Customer in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 348 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for wood bedroom cedar chests excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 3,500 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for wood bedroom cedar chests excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for wood bedroom cedar chests excluding custom furniture sold at retail directly to the customer in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 22
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 23
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 24
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 35
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 45
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 46
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 48
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 49
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 50
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 52
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 53
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 54
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 57
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 59
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 60
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 64
4 GREAT LAKES 67
4.1 Executive Summary 67
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 69
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 70
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 76
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 81
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 82
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 85
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 87
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 88
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 92
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 95
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 96
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 101
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 105
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 106
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 109
5 MID-ATLANTIC 111
5.1 Executive Summary 111
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 113
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 114
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 116
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 117
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 118
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 118
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 119
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 120
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 124
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 127
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 128
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 133
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 137
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 138
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 144
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 149
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 150
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 154
6 NEW ENGLAND 157
6.1 Executive Summary 157
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 159
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 160
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 163
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 165
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 166
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 168
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 169
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 170
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 175
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 179
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 180
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 182
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 183
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 184
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 186
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 187
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 188
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 188
7 PLAINS 189
7.1 Executive Summary 189
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 191
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 192
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 194
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 195
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 196
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 198
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 199
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 200
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 203
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 205
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 206
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 209
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 211
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 212
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 214
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 215
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 216
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 217
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 218
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 219
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 221
8 ROCKIES 222
8.1 Executive Summary 222
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 223
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 224
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 227
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 229
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 230
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 232
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 233
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 234
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 235
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 236
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 237
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 239
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 240
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 241
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 243
9 SOUTHEAST 244
9.1 Executive Summary 244
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 246
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 247
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 250
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 252
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 253
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 255
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 256
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 257
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 264
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 270
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 271
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 275
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 278
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 279
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 281
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 282
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 283
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 286
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 288
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 289
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 291
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 292
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 293
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 296
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 298
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 299
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 302
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 304
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 305
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 308
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 310
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 311
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 315
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 318
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 319
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 321
10 SOUTHWEST 322
10.1 Executive Summary 322
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 323
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 324
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 326
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 327
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 328
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 330
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 331
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 332
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 334
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 335
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 336
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 342
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 347
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 347
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 348

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.