The 2016-2021 Outlook for Woven Narrow Fabrics of Maximum 12-Inch Width in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 767 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for woven narrow fabrics of maximum 12-inch width across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for woven narrow fabrics of maximum 12-inch width. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for woven narrow fabrics of maximum 12-inch width in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 13
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 13
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 13
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 14
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 14
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 14
1.4.1 Category Definition 14
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 16
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 18
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 20
3.1 Executive Summary 20
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 25
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 27
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 28
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 49
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 69
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 70
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 74
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 77
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 78
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 81
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 83
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 84
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 89
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 93
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 94
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 103
4 GREAT LAKES 111
4.1 Executive Summary 111
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 112
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 113
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 128
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 142
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 143
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 151
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 158
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 159
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 169
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 178
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 179
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 193
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 206
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 207
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 218
5 MID-ATLANTIC 228
5.1 Executive Summary 228
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 229
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 230
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 232
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 233
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 234
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 234
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 235
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 236
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 244
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 251
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 252
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 263
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 273
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 274
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 300
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 325
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 326
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 343
6 NEW ENGLAND 360
6.1 Executive Summary 360
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 362
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 363
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 369
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 374
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 375
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 381
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 386
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 387
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 397
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 406
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 407
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 412
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 416
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 417
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 420
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 422
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 423
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 427
7 PLAINS 430
7.1 Executive Summary 430
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 432
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 433
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 439
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 444
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 445
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 450
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 454
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 455
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 463
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 470
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 471
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 479
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 486
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 487
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 490
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 492
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 493
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 495
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 496
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 497
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 499
8 ROCKIES 500
8.1 Executive Summary 500
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 501
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 502
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 507
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 511
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 512
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 515
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 517
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 518
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 521
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 523
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 524
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 529
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 533
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 534
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 536
9 SOUTHEAST 537
9.1 Executive Summary 537
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 539
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 540
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 546
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 551
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 552
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 557
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 561
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 562
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 579
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 595
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 596
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 604
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 611
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 612
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 617
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 621
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 622
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 628
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 633
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 634
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 638
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 641
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 642
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 651
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 659
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 660
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 666
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 671
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 672
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 678
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 683
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 684
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 690
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 695
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 696
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 699
10 SOUTHWEST 701
10.1 Executive Summary 701
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 702
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 703
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 708
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 712
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 713
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 716
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 718
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 719
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 724
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 728
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 729
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 748
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 766
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 766
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 767

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.