The 2016-2021 Outlook for Widgets in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 764 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for widgets across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for widgets. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for widgets in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 14
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 24
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 26
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 27
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 48
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 68
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 69
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 73
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 76
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 77
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 80
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 82
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 83
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 88
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 92
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 93
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 102
4 GREAT LAKES 110
4.1 Executive Summary 110
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 111
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 112
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 127
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 141
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 142
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 150
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 157
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 158
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 168
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 177
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 178
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 192
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 205
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 206
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 217
5 MID-ATLANTIC 227
5.1 Executive Summary 227
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 228
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 229
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 231
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 232
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 233
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 233
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 234
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 235
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 243
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 250
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 251
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 262
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 272
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 273
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 299
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 324
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 325
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 342
6 NEW ENGLAND 358
6.1 Executive Summary 358
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 359
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 360
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 366
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 371
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 372
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 378
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 383
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 384
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 394
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 403
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 404
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 409
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 413
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 414
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 417
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 419
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 420
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 424
7 PLAINS 427
7.1 Executive Summary 427
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 429
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 430
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 436
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 441
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 442
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 447
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 451
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 452
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 460
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 467
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 468
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 476
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 483
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 484
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 487
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 489
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 490
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 492
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 493
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 494
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 496
8 ROCKIES 497
8.1 Executive Summary 497
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 498
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 499
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 504
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 508
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 509
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 512
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 514
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 515
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 518
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 520
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 521
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 526
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 530
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 531
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 533
9 SOUTHEAST 534
9.1 Executive Summary 534
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 536
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 537
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 543
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 548
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 549
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 554
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 558
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 559
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 576
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 592
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 593
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 601
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 608
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 609
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 614
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 618
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 619
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 625
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 630
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 631
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 635
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 638
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 639
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 648
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 656
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 657
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 663
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 668
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 669
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 675
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 680
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 681
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 687
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 692
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 693
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 696
10 SOUTHWEST 698
10.1 Executive Summary 698
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 699
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 700
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 705
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 709
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 710
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 713
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 715
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 716
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 721
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 725
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 726
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 745
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 763
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 763
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 764

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.