The 2016-2021 Outlook for Wi-Fi Cellular Telephones in the United States

 Published On: Sep, 2015 |    No of Pages: 397 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for Wi-Fi cellular telephones across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 4,700 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of its state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis--vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for Wi-Fi cellular telephones. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales.

The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for Wi-Fi cellular telephones in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 17
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 20
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 21
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 24
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 25
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 38
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 50
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 51
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 53
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 54
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 55
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 57
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 58
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 59
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 62
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 64
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 65
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 70
4 GREAT LAKES 74
4.1 Executive Summary 74
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 75
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 76
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 83
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 89
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 90
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 93
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 95
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 96
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 100
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 103
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 104
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 110
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 115
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 116
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 120
5 MID-ATLANTIC 123
5.1 Executive Summary 123
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 124
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 125
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 127
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 128
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 129
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 129
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 130
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 131
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 136
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 140
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 141
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 148
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 154
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 155
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 162
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 168
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 169
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 175
6 NEW ENGLAND 180
6.1 Executive Summary 180
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 181
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 182
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 186
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 189
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 190
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 192
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 193
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 194
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 199
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 203
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 204
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 206
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 207
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 208
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 210
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 211
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 212
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 213
7 PLAINS 214
7.1 Executive Summary 214
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 216
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 217
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 220
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 222
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 223
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 225
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 226
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 227
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 231
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 234
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 235
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 239
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 242
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 243
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 245
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 246
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 247
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 248
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 249
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 250
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 252
8 ROCKIES 253
8.1 Executive Summary 253
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 254
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 255
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 258
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 260
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 261
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 263
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 264
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 265
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 266
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 267
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 268
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 271
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 273
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 274
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 276
9 SOUTHEAST 277
9.1 Executive Summary 277
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 279
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 280
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 283
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 285
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 286
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 288
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 289
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 290
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 298
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 305
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 306
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 311
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 315
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 316
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 319
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 321
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 322
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 325
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 327
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 328
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 331
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 333
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 334
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 338
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 341
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 342
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 345
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 347
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 348
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 351
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 353
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 354
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 358
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 361
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 362
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 364
10 SOUTHWEST 365
10.1 Executive Summary 365
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 366
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 367
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 370
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 372
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 373
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 375
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 376
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 377
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 380
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 382
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 383
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 390
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 396
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 396
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 397

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.