The 2016-2021 Outlook for Chilled Creme Caramel in the United States

 Published On: Apr, 2015 |    No of Pages: 705 |  Published By: Icon Group International, Inc | Format: PDF
Request Free Sample

This econometric study covers the latent demand outlook for chilled crème caramel across the states and cities of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 12,400 cities in the United States. For each city in question, the percent share the city is of it’s state and of the United States is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a city vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and city, latent demand estimates are created for chilled crème caramel. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. This study does not report actual sales data (which are simply unavailable, in a comparable or consistent manner in virtually all of the cities in the United States). This study gives, however, my estimates for the latent demand, or the P.I.E., for chilled crème caramel in the United States. It also shows how the P.I.E. is divided and concentrated across the cities and regional markets of the United States. For each state, I also show my estimates of how the P.I.E. grows over time. In order to make these estimates, a multi-stage methodology was employed that is often taught in courses on strategic planning at graduate schools of business.

Table Of Contents:

1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 Overview 9
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 9
1.3 The Methodology 10
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 11
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 12
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 12
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 12
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 13
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 13
1.4 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 13
1.4.1 Category Definition 13
1.4.2 Units 13
1.4.3 Methodology 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17
2.1 Latent Demand in The US 18
3 FAR WEST 19
3.1 Executive Summary 19
3.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alaska 21
3.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alaska 22
3.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alaska 23
3.5 Latent Demand by Year - California 25
3.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - California 26
3.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - California 46
3.8 Latent Demand by Year - Hawaii 67
3.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hawaii 68
3.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Hawaii 70
3.11 Latent Demand by Year - Nevada 73
3.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nevada 74
3.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nevada 75
3.14 Latent Demand by Year - Oregon 77
3.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oregon 78
3.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oregon 82
3.17 Latent Demand by Year - Washington 86
3.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Washington 87
3.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Washington 94
4 GREAT LAKES 102
4.1 Executive Summary 102
4.2 Latent Demand by Year - Illinois 103
4.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Illinois 104
4.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Illinois 118
4.5 Latent Demand by Year - Indiana 132
4.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Indiana 133
4.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Indiana 139
4.8 Latent Demand by Year - Michigan 146
4.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Michigan 147
4.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Michigan 156
4.11 Latent Demand by Year - Ohio 165
4.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ohio 166
4.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Ohio 179
4.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wisconsin 192
4.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wisconsin 193
4.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wisconsin 202
5 MID-ATLANTIC 212
5.1 Executive Summary 212
5.2 Latent Demand by Year - Delaware 214
5.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Delaware 215
5.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Delaware 216
5.5 Latent Demand by Year - District of Columbia 217
5.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - District of Columbia 218
5.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - District of Columbia 218
5.8 Latent Demand by Year - Maryland 219
5.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maryland 220
5.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maryland 226
5.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Jersey 233
5.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Jersey 234
5.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Jersey 243
5.14 Latent Demand by Year - New York 254
5.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - New York 255
5.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New York 279
5.17 Latent Demand by Year - Pennsylvania 303
5.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Pennsylvania 304
5.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Pennsylvania 321
6 NEW ENGLAND 338
6.1 Executive Summary 338
6.2 Latent Demand by Year - Connecticut 340
6.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Connecticut 341
6.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Connecticut 346
6.5 Latent Demand by Year - Maine 351
6.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Maine 352
6.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Maine 357
6.8 Latent Demand by Year - Massachusetts 362
6.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Massachusetts 363
6.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Massachusetts 371
6.11 Latent Demand by Year - New Hampshire 381
6.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Hampshire 382
6.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Hampshire 385
6.14 Latent Demand by Year - Rhode Island 389
6.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Rhode Island 390
6.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Rhode Island 391
6.17 Latent Demand by Year - Vermont 392
6.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Vermont 393
6.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Vermont 395
7 PLAINS 399
7.1 Executive Summary 399
7.2 Latent Demand by Year - Iowa 401
7.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iowa 402
7.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Iowa 407
7.5 Latent Demand by Year - Kansas 412
7.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kansas 413
7.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kansas 416
7.8 Latent Demand by Year - Minnesota 420
7.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Minnesota 421
7.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Minnesota 428
7.11 Latent Demand by Year - Missouri 435
7.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Missouri 436
7.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Missouri 442
7.14 Latent Demand by Year - Nebraska 449
7.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nebraska 450
7.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Nebraska 452
7.17 Latent Demand by Year - North Dakota 454
7.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Dakota 455
7.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Dakota 455
7.20 Latent Demand by Year - South Dakota 457
7.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Dakota 458
7.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Dakota 459
8 ROCKIES 460
8.1 Executive Summary 460
8.2 Latent Demand by Year - Colorado 461
8.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Colorado 462
8.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Colorado 466
8.5 Latent Demand by Year - Idaho 470
8.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Idaho 471
8.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Idaho 472
8.8 Latent Demand by Year - Montana 475
8.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Montana 476
8.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Montana 477
8.11 Latent Demand by Year - Utah 480
8.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Utah 481
8.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Utah 484
8.14 Latent Demand by Year - Wyoming 488
8.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wyoming 489
8.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Wyoming 490
9 SOUTHEAST 491
9.1 Executive Summary 491
9.2 Latent Demand by Year - Alabama 493
9.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Alabama 494
9.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Alabama 499
9.5 Latent Demand by Year - Arkansas 504
9.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arkansas 505
9.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arkansas 508
9.8 Latent Demand by Year - Florida 512
9.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Florida 513
9.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Florida 529
9.11 Latent Demand by Year - Georgia 545
9.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Georgia 546
9.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Georgia 553
9.14 Latent Demand by Year - Kentucky 560
9.15 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kentucky 561
9.16 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Kentucky 565
9.17 Latent Demand by Year - Louisiana 570
9.18 Cities Sorted by Rank - Louisiana 571
9.19 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Louisiana 576
9.20 Latent Demand by Year - Mississippi 581
9.21 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mississippi 582
9.22 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Mississippi 585
9.23 Latent Demand by Year - North Carolina 588
9.24 Cities Sorted by Rank - North Carolina 589
9.25 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - North Carolina 596
9.26 Latent Demand by Year - South Carolina 605
9.27 Cities Sorted by Rank - South Carolina 606
9.28 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - South Carolina 611
9.29 Latent Demand by Year - Tennessee 616
9.30 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tennessee 617
9.31 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Tennessee 622
9.32 Latent Demand by Year - Virginia 628
9.33 Cities Sorted by Rank - Virginia 629
9.34 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Virginia 634
9.35 Latent Demand by Year - West Virginia 639
9.36 Cities Sorted by Rank - West Virginia 640
9.37 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - West Virginia 642
10 SOUTHWEST 644
10.1 Executive Summary 644
10.2 Latent Demand by Year - Arizona 645
10.3 Cities Sorted by Rank - Arizona 646
10.4 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Arizona 649
10.5 Latent Demand by Year - New Mexico 653
10.6 Cities Sorted by Rank - New Mexico 654
10.7 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - New Mexico 656
10.8 Latent Demand by Year - Oklahoma 658
10.9 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oklahoma 659
10.10 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Oklahoma 663
10.11 Latent Demand by Year - Texas 667
10.12 Cities Sorted by Rank - Texas 668
10.13 Cities Sorted by Zipcode - Texas 686
11 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 704
11.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 704
11.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 705

If the above report does not have the information suitable for your business, we can provide custom research that can be lucrative for your business or enhance your profession.